Which isn't what he said: he (and dozens of others in the past) said 'Constitutional Rights' - to gather, to be free from harm, to due process, etc. et al.Rights, as in protection under the law, is one thing; full entitlement to benefits is quite another.
Oh, god, not the poor put-upon white man stuff. That's what the Minutemen (etc.) need you to believe to justify their acts.if and when whites start to feel specifically targeted because of their race
Yes they do.both sides on this illegal-immigration debate need to step back, take a breath, and get a grip.
There is not a single institutional bias against white males. No one is punished by society for being a white man.
Because they are very small groups with little influence.I notice that I dont seem to see a lot of people talking about hunting them down or gunning them down in the streets. Why is that?
You can start with affirmative action and results test.There is not a single institutional bias against white males. No one is punished by society for being a white man.
Work? Why work for the rich man in the nice house when you can bodily evict him and move in yourself?just who the heck are they going to work for then
There is not a single institutional bias against white males. No one is punished by society for being a white man.
Catholicism was the realm of the Irish and Italians back in the day (before all whites had to unite against people of color) - victims of the Know-Nothings (aka 'the Minutemen of the 1850s').
What is "affirmative action"?You can start with affirmative action and results test.
Nah.There is not a single institutional bias against white males. No one is punished by society for being a white man.
Would you like to show me statistics placing Irish, Italians and Jews in the same socio-economic climate as those of non-European descent?Unless you don't consider the Irish, Italians, or gasp Jews.
God only knows what you're arguing with this - the KKK had a stronger presence 70 years ago and acted violently toward ethnic minorities?Now the only problem was the wealthy Slovenian "papists," AKA my family. Only problem was, my great grandfather being a former Austro Hungarian cavalryman, as were most of the hired men were skilled in the use of arms and definately believed in the 2A. So please, don't tell me of the priviliged posistion of all white males.
Ah, the anecdotes start coming out.Nah.
Not my brother who was being pushed out of his job so his boss could get points for putting two black women in his place.
Not my friend perfectly suited for a job, told in no uncertain terms that while the best candidate for the position, his race and gender just didn't cut it.
Last year's hiring cycle where I work is an example. There were several hundred initial applicants. After testing, the candidate pool was narrowed to about 50. When interview invitations went out, white males were excluded. Human Resources said more minorities needed to be hired.What is "affirmative action"?
People throw phrases like that around, when they don't mean anything specific.
How can an abstract concept be punitive?
My brother had the position - not a "candidate". The switch was aborted when HR got wind of the situation, and chewed out the boss for pulling such BS.No white man ever lost out on a promotion because he was the lesser candidate, I guess.
God only knows what you're arguing with this - the KKK had a stronger presence 70 years ago and acted violently toward ethnic minorities?
What that has to do with the contemporary world, I don't know.
Would you like to show me statistics placing Irish, Italians and Jews in the same socio-economic climate as those of non-European descent?
Where in America can an Irishman not get a job? Are they discriminated against in politics? Are Catholic churches burned down?
Cripes, L.A. is 46% or 49% hispanic now. Seems like thisCrazed_SS said:You guys = people who are all up in arms over this whole "Aztlan" thing. As if such a thing is even possible.
So Human Resources felt that your company, in this anecdote, was previously biased toward whites? That it had a history of unfair hiring practices?ast year's hiring cycle where I work is an example. There were several hundred initial applicants. After testing, the candidate pool was narrowed to about 50. When interview invitations went out, white males were excluded. Human Resources said more minorities needed to be hired.
As always, the evidenciary problems of anecdotes...My friend was told "it's your race & gender" to his face - not something that would be made up, considering the legal consequences.
Integrated Slovenian immigrants are still being assaulted on a regular basis? Denied basic rights and privileges?It has everything to do with the contemporary world. These prejudices haven't disappeared.
I said nothing about illegals. I said 'people of non-European descent.' How are American Indians, Latino Americans, black Americans doing in general? How are recent Asian immigrants doing?There is a big difference between someone who is a citizen, facing prejudice, and an illegal working under the radar.
Approximately 1000% more than Mormon, Muslim, Jewish, etc., right?How many Catholic presidents have there been?
Isolated incidents do occur. But there is no systemic bias against any of the groups you've referred to - aside from ethnic immigrants, about whom I don't think you'll find anything I said to contradict that argument.While these things are much less noticeable in todays society, they do exist. You're blanket statement of the power and privilege of all white males is absurd.