Ultimate Bug out/Backpack Rifle

Status
Not open for further replies.

NewDefender

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
8
In terms of a bug out/backpack gun, I don't know if it gets much better than this, granted your number of rounds are limited.

Coming from Ruger, you can definitely count on reliability/functionality. The design is compact making portability super easy. So whether you intend to hike/camp through the wilderness and need a way hunt small game or need an offensive weapon when you're on the go, this little Ruger should be small and light enough to pack around; Not to mention ammo is dirt cheap and could easily be carried along at not much additional weight.

What do you all think of it in terms of a bug out rifle? Would a similar design in a larger caliber be more desirable?
 
Last edited:
When you are backpacking, 5 lbs of rifle is a lot of extra weight to be carrying with you.

For a backpack trip, a .22LR pistol or revolver would be a lot lighter.

I have shot a lot of small game (squirrels, rabbits, grouse etc) with .22LR pistols like the Ruger 22/45, and they are quite accurate for a backpack trip.

http://www.ruger.com/products/2245Target/models.html

Of the Ruger 10/22s I really love the Sporter:

http://www.ruger.com/products/1022Sporter/models.html

The Ruger 10/22 gives you double the distance however on small game shots, out to 50 yards at least, which is what is really nice about them.

My next 2 gun purchases will likely be these 2 particular Rugers, the 10/22 and the 22/45.
 
Last edited:
Me id take a look at one of the bushmaster ars with the plastic bottom end. My buddy has one and it weights less then 5lbs.
 
The pisol is 2 lbs, the rifle 4.6. To get the better accuracy and added velocity I would choose the rifle. I actually own the new takedown rifles as well as the Ruger pisol. The rifle would be my first choice for just such a situation. With a couple of 25 round magaznes plenty of ammo is available in a lighweight package. It is accurate enough for small game hunting in a bug out situaion and passable for SD.

Ruger has a winner with this one.
 
For a camp/compact rifle I use this one. As ready to use as a pistol, just as accurate as a 10/22, one piece and as compact while being shootable as most takedowns. Also, really quite with the can on.

1022.jpg

camp.jpg


I might look into a fishing pole and ear plugs though for bugging out. If everyone that has started a bugout/shtf thread hits the boonies this year, it's going to be as crowded as a rock concert out there. I imagine every bunny not in a cage at someones house will be shot and turned into a McMeal within a few weeks. For me, I'm good where I am so a belt fed 30 makes more sense.
 
This works too.

h002b-survival-open.jpg
 
This works too.

Yep, like the one in my post above. With some practice you can get them put together in just under a half a minute. The best thing about them is that they are very light, I'd say at least half the weight of their trigger pull.
 
For bug out or backpacking, I would go with this: http://www.marlinfirearms.com/firearms/selfloading/70pss.asp
Nothing against the Ruger, just an option.
Also, should be able to find the Marlin for cheap.
Picked one up for $50 because it would not feed. Cleaned, oiled the rifle and replaced the magazine (it was slightly dented in the side). Works well.
No hand guard on the barrel, but @ 3.25 lbs., it's a great little rifle :) .
 
I have been picking rock squirels off all spring at ranges out to 150 yds with one of my old 10/22's. My current favorite sports a Choate folder and 4x Redfield scope. It does pretty decent with bulk ammo of all flavors even at extended ranges.
I have some take off barrels and if the S ever really does HTF I will chop one of them down to the length of the forearm and make it even more compact but for now I'm not going to pay to SBR a 22.
But I can't think of a better gun that the little Rugers if a person wants to be armed and needs that "one gun". My second would be the 22 pistol in MKI or II Target.
 
Another vote for the Kel-Tec Sub-2000, if you are under 100 yards.
Very easy to carry.

Lateck,
 
I liked this rifle better the first time I saw it, back when it was called a Marlin Papoose!

The papoose was created over 100 years to late to be the first takedown .22, heck it's not even mmarlins first takedown 22
 
I think the Kel Tec Sub 2K is pretty nice. It folds up, and takes Glock mags..
 
I like the little Ruger, but for me I would prefer something with a little more bite. I currently have a Sub 2000 with the G17 magwell and can carry it with 4 of the G18 33 rd. mags in a standard briefcase and still have room for my sandwiches. My SU16C also folds into a pretty compact and lightweight package with considerably more punch.
 
In the following order of reliability and usefulness.
All .22 rimfire so you can hump the ammo you might need for shooting food to eat with attracting undue attention a mile away.
Or trading for toilet paper when you run out.


Winchester 06 / 62A pump rifle.
Browning SA-22 semi-auto rifle.
S&W Kit-Gun .22 revolver.
Colt Woodsman pistol.
Ruger MkI Standard pistol.
Browning Buckmark pistol.

rc
 
I built a 10/22 using a Tactical Solutions aluminum barrel, a Knoxx colapsable stock and a micro holographic red dot sight. It shoots like a Ruger should and it weighs 3 lbs. 9 oz. empty. It's like a toy. Tons of fun and as portable as can be.
 

Attachments

  • ruger.jpg
    ruger.jpg
    53 KB · Views: 31
Its true the 10/22 TD is a bit heavier than either the Papoose or the AR-7, but both these guns suffer from what I consider a flaw; the lack of a forearm. To me it makes both a bit uncomfortable and clumsy to shoot.

I had been considering picking up one of these two guns for years, but in the end I wound up buying the 10/22 TD and I'm very happy with my choice. YMMV.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top