Choclabman wrote:
I have met many Glock users over the years. The impression they make, is always the same. Poorly educated, have low paying jobs, and buy Glock because of the low price point. They then become fanatical, about all things Glock. I have found that many Glock fanatics, do not have much experience with other firearm platforms. For example. The majority of them, cannot tell you the difference between a Ruger Blackhawk, and a Freedom Arms 83 Premier.
OK... I suppose I have the right to answer this one. I've carried a Glock 19 for 13 years as I posted earlier.
The impression they make, is always the same.
Let's start with the stereotypes, shall we?
Poorly educated, have low paying jobs, and buy Glock because of the low price point.
Let's see...
THIS Glock 19 owner has 3 Bachelor's Degrees, a Master's Degree, and two professional designations. The smart money would be on ME having MORE education than you.
I carry a 1911 now because my wife wanted my Glock 19. Are you calling her poorly educated as well? She has a Bachelor's Degree, Master's Degree, and one professional designation.
So between us, we have 4 Bachelor's 2 Master's Degrees, and 3 professional designations.
Does a pilot evey have to get a college degree?
Shall we compare incomes next? My wife's uncle has been a pilot for Conteniental for well over 20 years. I have a good idea how a pilot stacks up against a seasoned (read: 15 year old) investment practice. I'm not overly concerned about your assessment.
They then become fanatical, about all things Glock.
The only thing I own with "Glock" on it is ...well, my Glock. Your stereotype fails again.
do not have much experience with other firearm platforms.
Considering I was reared in a firearms-oriented family, I likely have MORE firearms experience than you do. Considering I got my first handgun at 13 years old, I likely have more HANDGUN experience than you do.
For example. The majority of them, cannot tell you the difference between a Ruger Blackhawk, and a Freedom Arms 83 Premier.
Here's the first time you didnt' speak in absolutes. OK. Debatable-- as it would be with ANY group. Once again, your assumptions would be wrong with me.
In short, get over yourself. You show your arrogance and your ignorance simutaneously. Quite a feat, I must say...
-- John