230RN
2A was "political" when it was first adopted.
As I said, I used to go armed into my P.O. under that section D, "other lawful purpose," my "lawful purpose" being for self defense.
I gave up on that because of the controversies I'd seen and now leave my unloaded gun in a locked compartment in my locked car, per local (Denver) regs.
And except for the Avon-Bonidy case, I've never seen it tested. (In fact, the first judge involved said it was more or less OK, but a higher court said it was not more or less OK, and that it was not OK at all.)
I can't afford to make a case for my "lawful purpose," so I decided to be practical about it.
I mean, just because I can read and speak English pretty welll, doesn't mean prosecuting attorneys and Judges can. Just look at the word "infringed."
As a locally famous lawyer once told me...
Justice costs.
Terry, 230RN
I gave up on that because of the controversies I'd seen and now leave my unloaded gun in a locked compartment in my locked car, per local (Denver) regs.
And except for the Avon-Bonidy case, I've never seen it tested. (In fact, the first judge involved said it was more or less OK, but a higher court said it was not more or less OK, and that it was not OK at all.)
I can't afford to make a case for my "lawful purpose," so I decided to be practical about it.
I mean, just because I can read and speak English pretty welll, doesn't mean prosecuting attorneys and Judges can. Just look at the word "infringed."
As a locally famous lawyer once told me...
Justice costs.
Terry, 230RN
Last edited: