I've had about a dozen. Of them, the Raging Bull was the best assembled, timed, and had the best lockup. The PT92 was also well made, totally reliable and had high quality. A 85 shot twelve inches high at ten yards, had a horrible trigger and felt like the innards were filled with sand.
My tracker 17 is the most accurate handgun I've ever had, having produced sub one inch groups at 100 yards (2-7X scope) on CALM days. Pt22 was fine but ammo sensitive. Late model Judge is fine for what it is....a short range 410. A 94, again small frame, had a trigger worse than the 85 and our 'smith got it down to about twice what it should be...six pounds sa.
Overall, the bigger the frame on the revolvers, generally the better the fit/finish/trigger and lockup. On the autos, the 92s have done the best.
On the other hand, I did a pareto on factory sendbacks from our shop and Taurus was tied for first with SCCY and the Sig Mosquito for last year. The SCCY was a single model, as was the Mosquito, and the Taurus ran across the board with 2/3 being small frame revolvers and the others split among one 65, one 66, and a couple autos (709 and a 22).
My tracker 17 is the most accurate handgun I've ever had, having produced sub one inch groups at 100 yards (2-7X scope) on CALM days. Pt22 was fine but ammo sensitive. Late model Judge is fine for what it is....a short range 410. A 94, again small frame, had a trigger worse than the 85 and our 'smith got it down to about twice what it should be...six pounds sa.
Overall, the bigger the frame on the revolvers, generally the better the fit/finish/trigger and lockup. On the autos, the 92s have done the best.
On the other hand, I did a pareto on factory sendbacks from our shop and Taurus was tied for first with SCCY and the Sig Mosquito for last year. The SCCY was a single model, as was the Mosquito, and the Taurus ran across the board with 2/3 being small frame revolvers and the others split among one 65, one 66, and a couple autos (709 and a 22).