What is your favorite polymer frame center fire pistol?

What is your favorite brand of polymer frame pistol?

  • Glock

    Votes: 43 24.9%
  • Springfield Armory

    Votes: 9 5.2%
  • Smith & Wesson

    Votes: 27 15.6%
  • Walther

    Votes: 6 3.5%
  • Kimber

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Beretta

    Votes: 4 2.3%
  • SIG

    Votes: 21 12.1%
  • Taurus

    Votes: 4 2.3%
  • RIA

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Canuck

    Votes: 9 5.2%
  • Ruger

    Votes: 8 4.6%
  • HK

    Votes: 25 14.5%
  • CZ

    Votes: 13 7.5%
  • FN

    Votes: 3 1.7%
  • EAA

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Browning

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Star

    Votes: 1 0.6%

  • Total voters
    173
  • Poll closed .
Glock. In particular: Double-column-mag, 9mm. Originally, the Glock system was not a personal choice, except that I was choosing what I considered the least-bad of four mandated duty pistol system choices, but I managed to become accustomed, to the point of everything becoming habituated. Pre-Gen3 did not fit me, but Gen3 was OK. When Gen4 arrived, it fit my hands noticeably much better.

A Glock G17 is easy on my aging hands, and, I am too old to start fresh, with a new system. I have countless thousands of training reps, with 9mm, .40 S&W, and “sim gun” rounds. Those thousands of reps have resulted in hard-wired familiarity that would require a massive amount of expense and effort, with a new system, to hope to match what I can do, today.

Glocks do not have fully-cocked strikers, when a round is chambered, and everything is at rest. I appreciate that margin of safety. I realize that a more-modern design, with a fully-cocked striker, can have a “better” trigger pull. I have learned to manage the stock Glock trigger. Done. One less thing to worry about.

“Baby” Glocks can, if applicable, accept mags from their duty-sized and medium-sized brethren. Of course, some other pistol systems share this characteristic, but, it is value-added, for me. Logistics are simplified. Except for pinkie finger placement, handling characteristics are near-identical.

In case it ever becomes a factor, in a post-defensive-shooting investigation and/or prosecution, the Glock G17 is the standard duty pistol of the largest local PD. I used to work for that largest local PD, and they should have my firearms and tactical training records, on file.

If I were to try another manufacturer’s polymer pistol, the Shield Plus is the one that most has my attention. Its grip seem to fill my hand adequately, it seems to point well, and the controls do not seem awkward.
 
Glock. In particular: Double-column-mag, 9mm. Originally, the Glock system was not a personal choice, except that I was choosing what I considered the least-bad of four mandated duty pistol system choices, but I managed to become accustomed, to the point of everything becoming habituated. Pre-Gen3 did not fit me, but Gen3 was OK. When Gen4 arrived, it fit my hands noticeably much better.

A Glock G17 is easy on my aging hands, and, I am too old to start fresh, with a new system. I have countless thousands of training reps, with 9mm, .40 S&W, and “sim gun” rounds. Those thousands of reps have resulted in hard-wired familiarity that would require a massive amount of expense and effort, with a new system, to hope to match what I can do, today.

Glocks do not have fully-cocked strikers, when a round is chambered, and everything is at rest. I appreciate that margin of safety. I realize that a more-modern design, with a fully-cocked striker, can have a “better” trigger pull. I have learned to manage the stock Glock trigger. Done. One less thing to worry about.

“Baby” Glocks can, if applicable, accept mags from their duty-sized and medium-sized brethren. Of course, some other pistol systems share this characteristic, but, it is value-added, for me. Logistics are simplified. Except for pinkie finger placement, handling characteristics are near-identical.

In case it ever becomes a factor, in a post-defensive-shooting investigation and/or prosecution, the Glock G17 is the standard duty pistol of the largest local PD. I used to work for that largest local PD, and they should have my firearms and tactical training records, on file.

If I were to try another manufacturer’s polymer pistol, the Shield Plus is the one that most has my attention. Its grip seem to fill my hand adequately, it seems to point well, and the controls do not seem awkward.

Like you, I had a fair amount of skepticism when the Glock first came out. On top of that, Glocks are not something to hold in aesthetic contemplation. Over the years it became hard to argue the bulletproof reliably of the Glock. I own several today. My CCP is a G43 that has XS Big Dot Express sights…my eyes aren’t as good as they once were. I can pick that sight up in any light conditions better than anything else. I carry that pistol in a DeSantis Super Fly pocket holster. Despite the fact that much of Oklahoma is open carry, I don’t like to advertise that I have a gun when I’m in polite company. I’ve never had a Glock fail to run regardless of the ammunition used. Hard to argue with that kind of success.
 
I didn't vote as I only own 2, a Ruger SR22, not a centerfire of course, and a Sar B6. and I like both. I would like them better if they had steel frames though.
 
I own Glock and Sig plastic striker-fired pistols in 9mm. I didn't bother to vote because I suppose some how I like one over the other but who cares? It's a basic tool, nothing more.
But that basic tool, like a hammer, must perform the task correctly and repeatedly. For a hammer, it's hitting the nail on the head and driving the nail into the wood flush. Sadly, not all hammers perform this task properly to drive 16d/10d framing nails into 2x4s. My preferred choice of hammer for this task is Vaughn framing hammer with curved handle and Stanley Anti-Vibe framing hammer with waffle face as I can pound the nail flush with 1-2 strikes. With lighter head smooth face hammers, it takes several hits.

For me, test-by-fire for pistol is being able to hit POA under any shooting condition. This means the defensive pistol, especially smaller carry pistol, must be able to go from draw to bang fast and keep producing POI at POA on multiple targets fast. Most 50+ various brands and models of pistols I have shot past 30 years can do this at defensive distances of 7-15 yards with decent ammunition but some do it better than others. That's why some of us shoot "action pistol" matches and during "Bring your other (Non-match) pistol days" where factory stock pistols are run through the same match stages, certain brands/models shine while others are embarrassed in terms of stage times and accuracy of double taps on target

Try this test on your next range trip. With target at 7-10 yards, place 4 dots towards four corners of the target and place two shots per dot as fast as you can shoot in "N" or "Z" pattern and see which pistol produces less than 2" groups faster consistently.

I have done this test when helping others do pistol selection, especially for carry and pistols that come out on top often surprise the shooters. They are especially surprised when I do this with my eyes closed ... And then teach them to do it with their eyes closed - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...g-aid-against-flinching.912566/#post-12464404
 
If I had to pick a favorite brand, it would probably be HK - my P30SK and HK45 are fabulous (not a fan of the USP). My “favorite” polymer gun, though, is the Beretta PX4 full size. The rotating barrel lock up just sucks up the recoil!
 
My vote was Glock as well. I tried to broaden my horizons with Walther, Sig, SA, and Canik, and even Staccato’s and a Wilson Combat. They were all okay. But I’m just not as good with any other gun as I am consistently with Glock.

I do still have a few non-Glocks…but the predominant handgun brand in my possession are Glocks by far.

No excuses, no regrets. Not an emotional “fanboy” (which is a stupid term used by jealous people), but I am a fan of the black plastic blaster!
 
Out of the plastic fantastics I currently own (HK, Glock, Sig, SA)

HK wins by a wide margin.
 
I can't choose just one but this is one of them, my HK P30L.

EGWMm4O.jpg
 

What is your favorite polymer frame center fire pistol?​

The problem with this question is the definition of "frame." Is the grip module a "frame"? No, because that's not the part bearing the serial number. Actually, the FCU is the "frame." AFAIK none of those are made of polymer.
This is only true of the polymer framed guns which have removable FCU. Most polymer pistols on the market have serial numbered polymer frames
 
Don't have a Glock, but I've shot a couple and they're pretty good. I have a Canik I love. It's my 9mm target pistol. I got the Mete SFX version and love it. I might see about an SFT version, but this one is pretty good for my use. It does need a little more powder than my lightest target loads will provide, as I've had a couple of hiccups with those. I don't think it's meant for minimum charges and heavy bullets. It shoots factory ammo 100% and handles my hotter 147 grain XTP loads not problem. I have a red dot sight on it, which makes it even better for target use.
 
Yeah let me know when he can continuously fire this
The two pistol lines that I'm aware of that have removable FCUs are SIG and Springfield Armory....and they do indeed use Grip Modules

I'm not completely clear what you are asking in your post.

Are there any frame which can be fired, continuously or otherwise, without other parts installed?
 
Not surprised Glock is dominating this poll one bit, as I have 4 and like them a lot. I am surprised FN has only one vote at the time of this post. They make exceptional handguns and I absolutely love my 510 tactical 10mm. With that said I voted for Walther, which also surprises me with so few of votes. My ppq’s, pdp’s, and p99 are the most consistently accurate polymer guns I own. My 5” PDP compact and 5” ppq set the bar in accuracy for me, and I own hk’s, Sigs, rugers, cz’s, and s&w’s as well.
My current carry gun
1696218013843.jpeg
 
Back
Top