Golden Hound
Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2008
- Messages
- 778
Well, I sure as hell would buy a Korth if I could afford it, but I would have to be a multi-millionaire to be able to drop that kind of money on a gun and not have it make a big dent in my money. As it is, even if I had that kind of cash specifically set aside just for buying guns, (like if I got some kind of hypothetical nine thousand dollar gun-only gift certificate,) there are lots of things I'd rather have.
My "never buy" guns as in, would never buy them even if money was no object:
Glocks, simply because I hate the way they look.
Any rifle covered with rails all over - I hate the way rails look, and if a gun has to have them, I can only tolerate one single rail on top of the receiver. But in general I dislike them. If, for instance, if I were to get an AR, I would get one with a carrying handle and no rail at all.
Hi-Point guns because I can't stand the way they look. (Do they NEED to look so ugly in order to be functional? Do they literally have someone over there trying to create ugly designs?)
Tec-9 or Mac-10 - Don't like how they look.
Ruger - after reading about Ruger's ideology, I wouldn't want to support them.
Synthetic stocks - I would never buy any gun with a synthetic stock if a wood stock were not also available for that same gun.
(Is there any wood-worker here who might be able to make for me a wooden version of the HK91 wide forend? Send me a PM and quote me a price. I would like to have one, but they aren't made.) In other words I want it to look like this photo-shop image I created:
My "never buy" guns as in, would never buy them even if money was no object:
Glocks, simply because I hate the way they look.
Any rifle covered with rails all over - I hate the way rails look, and if a gun has to have them, I can only tolerate one single rail on top of the receiver. But in general I dislike them. If, for instance, if I were to get an AR, I would get one with a carrying handle and no rail at all.
Hi-Point guns because I can't stand the way they look. (Do they NEED to look so ugly in order to be functional? Do they literally have someone over there trying to create ugly designs?)
Tec-9 or Mac-10 - Don't like how they look.
Ruger - after reading about Ruger's ideology, I wouldn't want to support them.
Synthetic stocks - I would never buy any gun with a synthetic stock if a wood stock were not also available for that same gun.
(Is there any wood-worker here who might be able to make for me a wooden version of the HK91 wide forend? Send me a PM and quote me a price. I would like to have one, but they aren't made.) In other words I want it to look like this photo-shop image I created: