stiletto raggio
Member
I agree with what you said aobut fishing and shooting... some guys are backwoods food-getters, other guys do it purely as a hobby and are interested in the "finer" aspects of sporting. I'd be that most people are somewhere in between.
Also, I am sure there are plenty of good shooters who use Benellis (besides Tom Knapp). I, for one, used my M1 Field to wail on some college kids in trap, one of whom said "Benelli isn't in my vocabulary."
At the same, time, I have had the privilege of being taught by and shooting with some extremely talented individuals, and I can tell you that, especially with shotguns, the oft-intangible qualities of a gun can make a huge difference. Mechanically, how much of a difference is there bewtween a Stoeger double and a Holland and Holland? Not really that much. But quality matters. Anyone who insists otherwise is most likely just speaking of sour grapes. Some overriding emotional attachment aside, who wouldn't gladly trade a Remington for a Perazzi?
Also, I am sure there are plenty of good shooters who use Benellis (besides Tom Knapp). I, for one, used my M1 Field to wail on some college kids in trap, one of whom said "Benelli isn't in my vocabulary."
At the same, time, I have had the privilege of being taught by and shooting with some extremely talented individuals, and I can tell you that, especially with shotguns, the oft-intangible qualities of a gun can make a huge difference. Mechanically, how much of a difference is there bewtween a Stoeger double and a Holland and Holland? Not really that much. But quality matters. Anyone who insists otherwise is most likely just speaking of sour grapes. Some overriding emotional attachment aside, who wouldn't gladly trade a Remington for a Perazzi?