Owen
Moderator Emeritus
arthurcw,
may I quote your van analogy?
TIA
may I quote your van analogy?
TIA
He has NEVER, to this day, learned anything about military-style rifles, apologized, or done anything to undo the harm his words continue to cause.The American public -- and the gun-owning public; especially the gun-owning public -- would be better off without the hardcore military arms, which puts the average sportsman in a real dilemma". An Uzi or an AKM or an AK-47 should be no more generally available than a Claymore mine or a block of C4 explosive.
You’ve been swinging a two-edged sword. A United States in which someone can be ruined for voicing an unpopular opinion is a dangerous place.
Field n Stream is the "outdoor" magazine for people who's vehicles never get off the pavement, and think they are "outdoors" when they fly out to their vacation home on Martha's Vinyard.
To all the chatroom heroes who made him unemployable, I have a word of warning: You’ve been swinging a two-edged sword. A United States in which someone can be ruined for voicing an unpopular opinion is a dangerous place. Today it was Jim’s turn. Tomorrow it may be yours.
outofbattery said:I live on Martha's Vineyard and have " no legitimate use" for my AR's,FAL,HK's,AK... as these rifles are unlawful to use for deer hunting so it's a minor miracle that this place is one of the safest in the United States ( unless you go around accepting car rides on Chappy ) and not overrun but these horrible terror weapons or the X dozens of others that are barely restrained in their safes.
What is in the water these days that makes people think that a public apology excuses all past wrongs?
The quarry of choice (deer, elk, moose, whatever) has no chance of outrunning a long burst from assault weapons, and also it would ruin the meat to put that much lead into it!