It seems to me that in this Minnesota case (Worth v. Harrington), the judge is stretching the Bruen rationale to the limit. An age 21 requirement for carry seems reasonable, and consistent with historical precedents. I wouldn't be surprised if this Supreme Court, pro-gun as it is, overturns this judge's ruling (if it gets to them).
Not all ostensibly pro-gun decisions are to our benefit, long-term. We have to be careful not to get ahead of ourselves, and not too far ahead of public opinion.