Ar around 800$

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know you want a dust cover and a forward assist but I am very pleased with the S&W M&P15 Sport...which lacks both. I have never missed them. What is there is great. Much better looking parts than my Stag, which I will say worked flawlessly right out of the box. Very high level of fit an finish.

$600. Gives you $200 to play with for accessories before you get to ammo. Might be able to get an optic which gives you an AR with optic for $800.

Just a thought.

Do you have an earlier sport with the better barrel, or the newer one with the lesser (and 1/9) barrel?

Either way, there are a lot of differences between a Sport and some of the other rifles being discussed other than just a dust cover and forward assist
 
Do you have an earlier sport with the better barrel, or the newer one with the lesser (and 1/9) barrel?

Either way, there are a lot of differences between a Sport and some of the other rifles being discussed other than just a dust cover and forward assist
Please elaborate. I have the 1/9 barrel which will be fine for me. I will shoot 55s and 62s as the heavyiest. My stag was also 1/9. I don't need or want the 1/7 spin on those light bullets and I have no need or desire to shoot heavier bullets from this lightweight carbine.
 
Please elaborate. I have the 1/9 barrel which will be fine for me. I will shoot 55s and 62s as the heavyiest. My stag was also 1/9. I don't need or want the 1/7 spin on those light bullets and I have no need or desire to shoot heavier bullets from this lightweight carbine.

The original Sport had a Melonite 1/8 barrel with the 5R rifling. They went cheap on the barrel after a little while though.

I sometimes get threads confused...did the OP state that he doesn't care about getting sub-optimal performance from bullets longer than typical 55gr FMJ?
 
The original Sport had a Melonite 1/8 barrel with the 5R rifling. They went cheap on the barrel after a little while though.

I sometimes get threads confused...did the OP state that he doesn't care about getting sub-optimal performance from bullets longer than typical 55gr FMJ?
Thanks. I will never notice the difference. 55 grains for me. 62 also.
 
55's shoot just fine in a 1:7.
They shoot quite well in 1/9 too. Somehow this thread turned into rate of twist debate. I actually don't know much about it. I just know that 1/9 is perfectly fine for garden variety .223 and 5.56 ammo and that I have always gotten results that suite me.

The OP is looking for a good AR on an $800 budget and I think the M&P15 Sport fits it nicely. He also said he wanted a dust cover and a forward assist and the Sport does not fit that.
 
an AR is only an Armalite and Buds gunshop, Impact Guns, Guns America, Davidsons, CDNN, Kentucky Rifle comp. just to name a few have Armalites for just over $800, if you want a rifle in an AR frame, there are so many to choose from, I own a few and the best other than Armalites are Windham (the old Bushmaster, Rock River, DPMS and others) for more $$$$$ Colt and go up from there to some price AR framed rifles.
 
55's shoot just fine in a 1:7.

They sure do.

I think we all knew that already though.

They shoot quite well in 1/9 too. Somehow this thread turned into rate of twist debate. I actually don't know much about it. I just know that 1/9 is perfectly fine for garden variety .223 and 5.56 ammo and that I have always gotten results that suite me.

The OP is looking for a good AR on an $800 budget and I think the M&P15 Sport fits it nicely. He also said he wanted a dust cover and a forward assist and the Sport does not fit that.

It isn't the best idea to recommend a 1/9 barrel to somebody without first finding out whether or not they mind that sort of limitation. Much of the higher end ammo is much better suited to a 1/8 or 1/7 twist...particularly the heavy BTHP rounds like SMK's and Hornady's stuff.

Yes, 1/9 will shoot the typical/bulk 55gr stuff just fine.
 
I recommended a rifle, not a twist rate. An awful lot of .223 barrels are 1/9 so it's not really an out-of-spec thing.
 
Last edited:
My point was there is no down side to the Colt's 1:7 twist. There could be on the 1:9 depending on what you want to shoot. Just something else to consider when buying an AR.
 
My point was there is no down side to the Colt's 1:7 twist. There could be on the 1:9 depending on what you want to shoot. Just something else to consider when buying an AR.

Definitely.

(unless you wanted to shoot super light, say 35gr, varmint loads, in which case you would want a slow twist...but anybody who wanted to do that would be sure to know that and say that)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top