Holder Tells Congress they want to reinstate the Clinton Gun Ban

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 20, 2009
Messages
134
Location
Boulder Co
http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/08/holder-tells-congress-the-obama-administration-wants-to-ban-guns/

Last Thursday, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder appeared before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee to answer questions about his role in the deadly “Fast and Furious” gun-running scandal. However, instead of answers, Congress got more defiance, more arrogance, and more wasted time with an attorney general who clearly feels no sense of obligation to the American people or our rule of law.

But for all the stonewalling, there was at least one telling moment at this hearing, and it should concern law-abiding gun owners and all Americans who expect accountability from our government.

In a rash attempt to deflect attention away from himself and his own irresponsibility, Holder let Congress know that the Obama administration is still working toward the day when it can reinstate former President Bill Clinton’s so-called “assault weapons” ban. According to Holder:

This administration has consistently favored the reinstitution of the assault weapons ban. It is something that we think was useful in the past with regard to the reduction that we’ve seen in crime, and certainly would have a positive impact on our relationship and the crime situation in Mexico.


It’s difficult to follow Holder’s logic here, but it goes something like this …

The Obama administration — particularly Eric Holder’s Justice Department — oversaw an epic scandal whereby our own federal government illegally funneled thousands of firearms into the hands of Mexican drug lords. This contributed to the death of one U.S. Border Patrol agent and hundreds of Mexicans.

Despite being head of the Justice Department and our nation’s chief law enforcement officer, Eric Holder claims he doesn’t know how or why this scandal occurred, or even who under his charge may have authorized it. He also refuses to turn over critical documents to congressional investigators that could help prevent something this tragic and corrupt from ever happening again.

Therefore, Obama and Holder are confident that if they can ban a large number of the legal firearms that law-abiding Americans use every day for self-defense, hunting, and recreational and competitive target shooting, it will help solve Mexico’s crime problem.



What’s particularly galling about Holder’s shallow and illogical attempt to use “Fast and Furious” to further the Obama administration’s gun-ban agenda is that during the same hearing, he lectured Congress for playing political “gotcha” games in an election year.

Amazingly, Holder seems incapable of understanding that this isn’t a Republican or Democratic issue, it’s an American issue, and all Americans deserve to know how and why their government purposefully allowed thousands of guns to flow into the hands of murderous Mexican drug cartels. The family of Border Patrol agent Brian Terry deserves to know why two of these guns were found at the scene of Terry’s murder.

Eric Holder’s Justice Department oversaw this illegal operation, but all Holder is willing to do is call for gun bans on law-abiding Americans, withhold critical information from Congress, and pat himself on the back for a job well done. As Holder told Congress on Thursday: “I’m proud of the work that I’ve done as attorney general of the United States, and looked at fairly, I think I’ve done a pretty good job.”

Eric Holder has long since proved himself inept and incapable of holding the trust that Americans place in our nation’s chief law enforcement officer. The longer Holder refuses to step down as attorney general, the more lasting his damage to this sacred institution will be.

Chris W. Cox is the executive director of the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) and serves as the organization’s chief lobbyist.



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/08/h...ministration-wants-to-ban-guns/#ixzz1lrXWVYWg
 
Holder is the one that should be banned....


From EVER having public office again
 
Well, so much for speculation that an "assault weapons ban" was the end goal for "fast and furious." He just came right out and said it (essentially). It's maddening that Holder is still in office/power. It really shows how out of touch he is with public perception of guns and low crime stats despite all the new shifts toward self defense and concealed carry.
 
Did anyone other than Obama apologists have any doubt whatsoever that this was where they were going with F&F?
 
OMG
WHY
WHY
don't we see this in big media??
you have an administration that was funneling guns into mexico, this is as big as Iran-Contra or any of the Clinton gates, hell bigger, THIS KILLED (and is killing) Americans

WOW, just wow
 
The 94 AWB worked well for the democratic congress, didn't it? Omnibus Crime Bill passed in September (IIRC), in November the republicans swept both sides of the house.

Spread the WORD. Buy ammo now. Enjoy the ride.
 
I remember nearly four years ago President Obama did an audience Q&A (forgot whether it was during election season or right after he took office) and someone asked about reinstatement of the AWB. "We can't get it done right now." was his response.
 
Spread the WORD. Buy ammo now. Enjoy the ride.

I think buying a few "evil black rifles" and extra ammo in some popular calibers might not be a bad idea right now. :)

I think a tagline copped from the awful "alien vs. predator" movies fits this election season: "whoever wins, we lose."
 
I don't like the sound of any of it.

However, IIRC, it just amounted to the AR's coming out without flash suppresors, and limited to 10 round mags. I'd imagine if they were trying to reinstate it, it would include so other restriction on top of those as well.

While I can hope all I want that this administration is out come this November, I'm not sure what hope that is. Living in Kansas, we've been a Republican state for quite some time. It's all those swing states that really have the say in who is in office.
 
It seems to me they used to put a coat of varnish on their crap to try and make it look good. Now they don't bother.

Or am I just getting paranoid?
 
That is like a robber getting caught red-handed, thrown in prison, and then asking "can I still have the money?"
 
It really shows how out of touch he is with public perception of guns and low crime stats despite all the new shifts toward self defense and concealed carry.

He's not out of touch and he understands it perfectly. He just doesn't care, and neither does his boss. It's not about gun control and it's not about crime control. It never has been. It's about control. Period.
 
He's not out of touch and he understands it perfectly. He just doesn't care, and neither does his boss. It's not about gun control and it's not about crime control. It never has been. It's about control. Period.

That.

It's also about pandering to the partys anti-gun base.
 
A showdown is coming - you can count on it and Romney sure ain't the anwer. Don't thing Gingrich is either. Term limits is the only real solution short of the unmentionable.
 
They don't have the votes.

Not yet they don't. And we need to keep it that way.

We'll be in an interesting time here coming up soon. Senate goes for us hands down next election. Statistically it's going to be a killing based on Dems seats vs. Rep seats up for grabs, with most seats being Dems this time around.

This may be the only protection we have, a pretty strong check and balance along with the House being ours already.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top