Doc3402
Member
And in the example you cited, what is the EVIDENCE "that there has been involvement in criminal activity".
As pointed out earlier they don't need EVIDENCE, they need a reasonable suspicion. Here, let me post that sentence again.
There must be a reasonable suspicion that there has been involvement in criminal activity.
Do you have it this time? It's Terry vs Ohio in case you want to Google it.
And now, I'm done with you. You will do things the way you want to do them, and that's fine with me. I'm going to do what common sense tells me to do. Get over it.