Ignition Override
Member
Wolfsburg:
Have you read information at "Warrifles"?
Those guys are really earnest about their preferences.
Have you read information at "Warrifles"?
Those guys are really earnest about their preferences.
mojo peepsites, new furniture, with trigger upgrades, and pistol grip, side rail picatinny, for your optic, your optic. Everything, EVERRRRRYYYTHHHHINNG, excluding the rounds, all for the cost, of 1 of those mentioned above. Cooool.
To answer your question, I will need more years to save up and purchase more of the rifles of the type to compare, contrast, and provide a good opinion....and I'd like some input on how best to scratch it. I've been looking at some high-capacity options and really am at an impasse on how to proceed. I've though about an AR-10 (or .308 AR-style rifle), an FN FAL of some sort, or a PTR-91. What other options are out there? What do you all recommend?
gga357 said:I vote for the POF-308 16".
I don't understand the constant reference to the cost of magazines when choosing a rifle. I couldn't give a rats a$$ if the magazines cost $1, $5 or $50 .... in fact, magazine cost doesn't even figure into the decision process for me. I'm concerned about accuracy and reliability, and as long as magazines are available then it's all good. When I picked up the POF, the gun shop owner gave me one Panther 19 round mag for free, the POF came with one C Products mag and I bought two more Panther mags for $45 each ... that's almost 80 rounds of .308 at my disposal. That'll be it for me until MAGPUL brings out a PMAG in .308.
taliv said:i shot a lot and had at least 5 mags fail that i can think of. i'm glad they were $9 D&H and $11 PMAGs, instead of $117 KAC mags
You're recommending a rifle as the best there is, and yet you apparently don't own one?seriously, it just doesnt get more awesome than that.
m1a. any mission, any foe, any range
god, please let me have one someday, please.
Yes indeed. 80 rounds is more than enough for any conceivable need.I don't understand the constant reference to the cost of magazines when choosing a rifle. I couldn't give a rats a$$ if the magazines cost $1, $5 or $50 .... in fact, magazine cost doesn't even figure into the decision process for me. I'm concerned about accuracy and reliability, and as long as magazines are available then it's all good.
If you stop buying cheap equipment, you shouldn't have any problems.well, if you used your guns more it would.... i shot a lot and had at least 5 mags fail that i can think of. i'm glad they were $9 D&H and $11 PMAGs, instead of $117 KAC mags
FWIW, I have never experienced or witnessed any problems with issue 'inch-pattern' FAL magazines. Ever.
Reid73
You're recommending a rifle as the best there is, and yet you apparently don't own one?
taliv said:fail == crack, welds on spine let go, feed lips spread or otherwise just cease functioning
Most (though certainly not all) of my experience with the FN-FAL was acquired in the military. I certainly can't tell you how many specific rounds of ammunition I have fired, or individual magazines I have used ... "lots" is the best I can say (anyone who claims they can recall such specifics is being economical with the truth ... let's get real).that statement might possibly be meaningful if we knew how many mags and rounds you used in training, matches or otherwise away from a bench.
Wolfsburg said:For better or worse, I took the plunge on a PTR-91F. It should be here tomorrow or Wednesday. Wish me luck!