Taurus GX4 safety notice 5/23/2023

Taurus has added more serial #s to the list as of today (5-26-2023). I just bought my GX4 on May 6th. Mine is not affected. I just hope they don't keep adding serial #s.
 
What?!?!! How can this be??? Taurus is sooooo much better now. :rolleyes:o_O

Sorry, saw this coming from a mile away. Good luck to anyone affected and now needing to deal with the famous Taurus cs.
 
Seriously? There is NO excuse for drop firing issues. Load a shell case with a primer, suspend the pistol, and WHACK it with a hammer from every direction. If you have a drop firing design issue you should know it within a couple hours of testing. If the pistol passes the hammer test, THEN you can perform the carefully controlled officially prescribed drop firing testing.

It's that simple, UNLESS your drop firing protection design has maintenance issues.

This really isn't rocket science. This is high school physics.
 
Seriously? There is NO excuse for drop firing issues. Load a shell case with a primer, suspend the pistol, and WHACK it with a hammer from every direction. If you have a drop firing design issue you should know it within a couple hours of testing. If the pistol passes the hammer test, THEN you can perform the carefully controlled officially prescribed drop firing testing.

It's that simple, UNLESS your drop firing protection design has maintenance issues.

This really isn't rocket science. This is high school physics.

Well, Sig couldn’t figure it out either at first. No wonder the majority of L.E have ditched their products and aren’t allowed for duty/off duty anymore.
 
Last edited:
Seriously? There is NO excuse for drop firing issues. Load a shell case with a primer, suspend the pistol, and WHACK it with a hammer from every direction. If you have a drop firing design issue you should know it within a couple hours of testing. If the pistol passes the hammer test, THEN you can perform the carefully controlled officially prescribed drop firing testing.

It's that simple, UNLESS your drop firing protection design has maintenance issues.

This really isn't rocket science. This is high school physics.
You must have missed the memo that we are all the beta testers for the manufacturers now.
 
Well, Sig couldn’t figure it out either at first.......

The question is whether or not Sig learned their lesson with the P320. I know the lawsuits continue even with the new and improved design. But I haven't seen anyone actually demonstrate the alleged uncommanded discharge problem with the new design, so there is a good chance that those lawsuits are BS. We'll have to wait and see.

The P365 series now appears to be a good solid design AFTER they let their customer find the design bugs for them.

I've worked for a dozen corporations over the years and I would only consider one of them to be both competent AND ethical. I actually had one employer ask me to falsify a UL Safety Test report. Needless to say I don't have a lot of faith in any corporations.
 
Looking at this I find myself wondering if this issue is a bad batch of parts. If it was a design issue you would think they would recall all pistols. Maybe they used some parts that were not within the proper tolerances.
 
Looking at this I find myself wondering if this issue is a bad batch of parts. If it was a design issue you would think they would recall all pistols. Maybe they used some parts that were not within the proper tolerances.

If quality control is the problem that is ALSO a serious indictment of the company!!! Good quality control starts with a good design using good manufacturing processes. Not all designs are production worthy. Inspection is only necessary to prove that your processes are up to snuff. But if a product is critical, 100% inspection and testing should be performed. Unfortunately the quality control of many companies leaves something to be desired.

A company's culture can have a huge impact on quality. A Pennywise and Dollar Foolish company that I worked at for a short time was selling a testing instrument that sold for $52K. But they were so cheap that they wouldn't spend the money to buy the proper terminal crimper for the terminals that they were using. Instead they had the assemblers tin the ends of the wire with solder and then crimp on the terminal. The crimp was so bad that you could slide the terminal back and forth over the wire. Needless to say this caused an intermittent connection. Surprise, surprise, surprise! Their products were plagued with quality control problems. I wonder why?
 
Mine isn't affected by the recall, either. I bought it kind of on a whim and didn't expect a lot, but it's been a good shooter. I appreciate useful PSA's like this.
 
Back
Top