THR Group Project - RIFLE - Advanced Reloading Concepts and Discussions

Status
Not open for further replies.
- LOADING NEAR/AT MAXIMUM

Repost from another thread - http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?p=10171983#post10171983

stringnut said:
Bart B. said:
What's the best definition of "maximum?"

Peak pressure? Muzzle velocity?

One is often measured with good precision in a 2% range. The other is rarely measured with good precision in a 15% (or greater) range.

One's not a safety issue. The other one is.

Will a manual's max load always be at or less than SAAMI's max average pressure in anyone's rifle?
The loads should be within the SAAMI parameters. Individual firearm variation is why you should work your way up in small increments, or, if you change components.
Another variable is commercial vs military cases.

Often with my .308 loads, I cannot exactly replicate published load data components as I particularly prefer to use military LC headstamp once-fired brass with crimped primer pockets with thicker walls that reduce internal case volume.

So my load development and powder work up rely more on the muzzle velocities measures on the chrono and reduced powder charges that produce optimal accuracy than maximum published load data.

I used to sort resized brass by weight but now I sort by internal case volume.
 
BDS great thread idea, I'm looking forward to following it.
Currently using lc 14 brass, cci 450 primer, varget and 77 smk loaded to 2.260 oal.
In my rifle, brass looks good, groups good,2525 fps note: this load is over max per hodgdon data for 223 loads, so work up to it.

l haven't checked runout or neck thicknesses yet, or water volumes or bullet weight/length and sorted.
I got a runout guage, from 21st century, and a neck guage from redding. So I'll try them.

Currently lubing with imperial, and mica inside neck, decapping in a separate step, sizing with a redding die with carbide ball, trimming, Chamfer,deburr,brush neck, remove crimp,brush primer pocket.

I'm wanting to see if runout will be better or worse than using a redding body die and lee collet neck die.
Whichever gives the least runout, I'll use.
 
Last edited:
Accuracy Contributors

Once you have loaded ammo and are ready to test it with a shouldered rifle resting on something atop a bench, keep in mind what each part of the system contributes to accuracy:

Ammo, 25%.

Rifle, 25%.

Human, 50%.

They all have variables in different directions and amounts for each shot.
 
BDS, A few months ago I bought a 1000 cases of LC .762 from Wideners. I knew it was probably MG brass, but I wanted to see what could be made of it, not for benchrest ammo, but for very accurate AR 10 ammo. (Remington R25 to be exact)

I bought an RCBS Case Master Concentricity Gage. I have and use a .308 small-base sizer, and a Gold Medal Seating die. I also use a Hornady OAL gage for keeping bullets off the lands a few thousandths, and an RCBS mic to set the sizer shoulder bumping. (Note: for the R25 the magazine length was way shorter than the lands, so that determined maximum OAL).

So with that I wanted to test the water. I blinged a 100 cases in a wet/stainless pin media tumbler, that left me with very shiny new looking brass.

The next step surprised me. Sizing! Yup it must have been MG brass. It was sizable but not easy. The usual process, using a little Imperial wax would not size this stuff. I think my brass, blinged as above created, even more friction than the MG (machine gunned) alone did. Long story short, RCBS lube pad was necessary, with a little brushed inside the necks. (gee, I've used Imperial for years)

Next came the brass neck runout test: Using the RCBS gage it ran from .002" to .008" using the sizer's included expander button.

So I removed the expander button and retested: The gage measured .001"-.002"

I won't go into the details here, but I reinstalled the button, resized a dozen cases 3 times each rotating each case 120 degrees, and remeasured. They all came out .001"!

Interesting, yes? I know resizing work hardens the brass, but I wanted to know.;)

So then, I was left pondering about the other options:

1. Bushing dies: Yes, they do away with the buttons that tend to yank shoulders out of concentricity, but they aren't perfect either. For one thing they can't size the whole shoulder, for another they are loose in the die so perfect runout is pretty elusive still.

2. Old time benchresters used to remove their expander buttons and hone the insides of a regular sizer's neck, to open it up enough to seat their bullets. It worked VERY well. Runout was mostly eliminated.

Only problem was that neck thickness had to be the same for all brass......or make another honed sized for each kind of brass you use.

Anyway, it seems that Forster provides a cheap $10 service if you buy their sizer's! They will hone the necks to any diameter......usually bullet diameter minus .002" plus 2x neck thickness. I aim to try that....or maybe hone my own small-base die. So using .308 bullets, the target diameter would be .306" plus neck thickness. Anyway, jury is still out....will let you know how it turns out.

3. The third option is using a Lee collet die.......who can tell us the pluses or minuses of that number?? I have never seen one......I do know that it only neck sizes, but perhaps it could be used after the small base die minus the expander button?


My experiment with this LC brass is ongoing....I have not shot any of these rounds yet, and only seated a few to test the effect of the Gold Medal Seater on near perfectly straight necks (.001") The result typically was to add a thousandth....finished rounds have been .002". Can't wait to shoot a few in my Remington R25!

Perhaps the above may jump start this thread with experiences of your own.


Keep in mind I'm not shooting F class and I don't mean to bring up an old topic but here is three shots from a load I was developing for my savage scout the brass is Lake City (probably mg since the long range 7.62 is makes LC LR). I very basically loaded these rounds cleaned sized trimmed chamfered and demurred primed charged seated just off the lands this was my best set of three of the different charges at 100 yds
ac3328162e6130c25caadbe55c4a4405.jpg



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
An interesting thread, for sure. Now that I've finally found a system for getting accurate measurements for seating on/off the lands I'm interested in what other .22 cal varmint gunners are doing in this regard. I see jrowland77's having good luck at .02" off for .308 but for my .223 bolt action with soft varmint bullets I seem to be doing well seated slightly (.002") into the lands. Seating tighter indeed seems to require less propellant, but I haven't determined whether it really affects consistency one way or the other and would be interested in knowing what other varminters are experiencing in this regard. Thanks to BDS big time for this thread.
 
a fourth thing that contributes to accuracy is the environment. temp, humidity, elevation, wind, shooting platform (bipod, front rest, rear rest, off-hand, etc.). i always write down as many environmental factors as i can when shooting for accuracy. i expect a better group on a dead calm day.

murf
 
Keeping environmental records is very important I use iSnipe and it stores my environmental data for my zero and factors it into the current environmental data


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I have to resize the MG LC brass 2 times with RCBS lube to get it right for my ar10, SB die. 243,30/30 Lee collet just doesn't work.
I guess I must just get lucky with MG brass. I have 20K, maybe 30K, that went through a 240 to start with (a couple K were actually through a minigun and about 1K through a 1919) and after I reload them they go through a 1919 again. I'm not having to resize them multiple times. Just one time through either an RCBS regular FL 308 die or a Lee FL 308 die on a Lee Challenger Breech Lock press. I started using the Dillon case lube and have since started using a homebrew of lanolin and alcohol cut 5:1 (makes a mess out of the die mouth after a thousand rounds, but does not stick a case).

Now the first 3K I ever resized were on my Dillon 550 and there I had to resize multiple times, but since switching to the single stage for sizing, there have been no more problems.

And since I know that someone will ask how many reloads I'm getting when firing exclusively through a machine gun the answer is 10. Unless it is LC08 brass. LC08 seems to blow off case heads within 3 loads. I tend to run VERY low pressure loads and the brass doesn't show signs of incipient failure beforehand. They just let go. Weird.

Chris
 
Rifle reloading newbie here. :D

Previously, I could not mount target paper past 100 yards so it was "minute of gong" at 300-600 yards but with new shooting spot, I can mount targets out to 300 yards.

For .223/5.56/.300 BLK/.308, time not being a factor, what brass prep/reloading practices would reduce the size of shot groups the most excluding powder/projectile?
 
For .223/5.56/.300 BLK/.308, time not being a factor, what brass prep/reloading practices would reduce the size of shot groups the most excluding powder/projectile?

Brass prep is not needed to shoot 1/2 MOA groups at worst through 200 yards if quality rifles and bullets are used with good commercial cases. Sierra Bullets does no case prep at all with their cases used to shoot their bullets testing for quality. All of their match bullets have to shoot under 1/2 MOA in their 200-yard indoor test range. They meter charges directly into cases and a 2/10ths to 3/10ths spread in charge weight is good enough.

Full length sizing dies with their neck's about .002" smaller than loaded round neck diameter set to bump fired case shoulders back a couple thousandths is what Sierra bullets uses as well as top ranked center fire rifle competitors use. Redding or RCBS full bushing dies or one from Forster they've honed the neck out to your specs for an additional $12; either way is going to work well.

Note that accuracy on target depends on how 3 things perform. 25% is the rifle, another 25% is the ammo and us humans are the remaining 50%. Don't fall into the popular trap that the smallest few-shot group shot represents the accuracy of the rifle and its ammo. Benchresters shooting their rifles in free recoil (99% of human variables are removed) see a 4 to 5 times spread of several 5-shot groups shot in a day. And their first one is not always the smallest one; that tiny group can occur at any time.
 
Last edited:
bds,

less than 1.5 thousandths variance in neck wall thickness either by sorting or neck trimming. good commercial brass should all be less than 1.5.

murf
 
Well, I deprime them first. Then I have these two plugs I bought that have o-rings on them from 21st Century (super cheap). I insert plug, weigh them together, write down that number. Fill with water, weigh again. The difference is your water capacity.

Thanks for the explanation. I just received mine and was wondering...this way makes perfect sense.

Russellc
 
Selecting and Preparing Reloading Components for Match-Grade Loads - https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2017...ng-reloading-components-for-match-grade-loads

Reloading Techniques For Match-Grade Loads - https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2018/8/29/reloading-techniques-for-match-grade-loads/

Part 1: Reloading at the Range - https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2016/10/31/reloading-at-the-range

Part 2: Reloading at the Range - https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2017/6/20/transporting-success-reloading-at-the-range-part-2


Handloading Philosophies and Choices (By AMU Custom Firearms Shop) - https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2016/4/08/handloading-philosophies-and-choices

Part 1: Vertical Dispersion (Is it your ammo or something else?) - https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2017/5/15/vertical-dispersion-is-it-your-ammo-or-something-else/

Part 2: Vertical Dispersion (Mechanical Issues and Ignition Irregularities) - https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2017...mechanical-issues-and-ignition-irregularities


Next check your finished loads and test accuracy with chronograph:

By U.S. Army, Army Marksmanship Unit, Custom Firearms Shop -
https://www.goarmy.com/events/army-marksmanship-unit.html

Part 1: How to check your work. How does your ammunition perform? - https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2016...-work-accuracy-and-chronograph-testing-part-1

Part 2: How to obtain the best accuracy during rifle and ammunition testing - https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2016/8/12/accuracy-and-chronograph-testing-part-2/

Part 3: Scope magnification, proper target size, crosshair focus and parallax - https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2016/8/19/accuracy-and-chronograph-testing-part-3/

Part 4: Optimizing optics for accuracy testing - https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2016/8/26/accuracy-and-chronograph-testing-part-4/

Part 5: Using iron sights for accuracy testing of ammunition - https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2016/9/2/accuracy-and-chronograph-testing-part-5/

Part 6: Accuracy testing Service and Match Rifles using iron sights - https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2016/9/19/accuracy-and-chronograph-testing-part-6/

Part 7: Using chronographs to measure bullet speed and obtain useful trajectory and wind data - https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2016/9/23/accuracy-and-chronograph-testing-part-7/

Part 8: Chronograph testing and evaluating handloads for Service and Match Rifles - https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2016/10/7/accuracy-and-chronograph-testing-part-8/
 
Last edited:
I've loaded a lot of rifle practice and hunting loads but not what I'd term precision loads. Having recently acquired a Ruger PR in .243, I found the following site very informative for starting down the rabbit hole:

https://www.longrangehunting.com/threads/load-development-ruger-precision-rifle-243.166145/

They do some OCW testing, and that's explained here:

http://optimalchargeweight.embarqspace.com/

I just completed my first OCW test but also recorded velocities to see if the velocity plateaus coincided with the accuracy nodes. Perhaps it's a new twist on Dan Newberry+Scott Satterlee (DNSS?)?
 
I follow the the Audette ladder system for load work up.
A chronograph is nice, but can be distracting.
My loads worked up without one still have a very low es by the time I'm done.
The one thing that I really noticed was that after having 2 knee surgeries and not being able to run anymore, my resting heart rate went from low 40s to low 60s. This made a huge difference in the amount of concentration needed to break the shot between heart beats. If you are serious about shooting well, don't neglect your physical health.
 
I follow the the Audette ladder system for load work up.
A chronograph is nice, but can be distracting.
My loads worked up without one still have a very low es by the time I'm done.
The one thing that I really noticed was that after having 2 knee surgeries and not being able to run anymore, my resting heart rate went from low 40s to low 60s. This made a huge difference in the amount of concentration needed to break the shot between heart beats. If you are serious about shooting well, don't neglect your physical health.
I see the chronograph as a nice to have but agree it is not absolutely a must have tool. As to heart rate? When I was younger I also averaged about 40 BPM but with age at 69 I am about 60 BPM which is still fine but not what my younger more athletic body had. :)

Even during my younger days in the Marine Corps and later at shoots we learned to use the sling as a pulse stopper, similar to this.

Ron
 
I follow the the Audette ladder system for load work up.
A chronograph is nice, but can be distracting.
My loads worked up without one still have a very low es by the time I'm done.
The one thing that I really noticed was that after having 2 knee surgeries and not being able to run anymore, my resting heart rate went from low 40s to low 60s. This made a huge difference in the amount of concentration needed to break the shot between heart beats. If you are serious about shooting well, don't neglect your physical health.


Physical health is critical for sure.
But I don’t know any serious shooter that times their heartbeats.
 
I follow the the Audette ladder system for load work up.
There’s a number of Ford, Chevy and Ram systems out there, you just need to choose something and work towards that low ES, low SD, and hope the human component can do it’s part. I had understood the ladder system wanted to know velocity. I’m very new to this long range shooting, but it seems the vertical accuracy depends on a stable and known velocity and the horizontal (windage) is up to the shooter. I’m all for a chronograph to understand the velocity rather than burn a lot of ammo to determine it. But to each his own! And, yes, I’ve seen my heartbeat is an issue...but I kinda like it.
 
I have some great news.

When I started reloading .308 for precision with sorted LC brass by date (Internal water volume varied by year), my mind was blown when I found "The Rifleman's Journal" by Germán A. Salazar. I spent countless days and nights reading through various articles, range tests and in-depth studies of different reloading and shooting variables to optimize accuracy out to 1000 yards for Palma match loads (And I was just trying to shrink my group size at mere 100 yards).

Until the website became "by invitation only" ... Well, great news is that this comprehensive website (That compliments various resource link posts like #40) got archived and became viewable by everyone again (Pages do load slow so be patient but contents are definitely worth the wait).

Here's the home page with articles listed by year - https://web.archive.org/web/20150309205518/http://riflemansjournal.blogspot.com/

Here's the index page with articles grouped by topic - https://web.archive.org/web/2015030...ansjournal.blogspot.com/p/articles-index.html

Even though you may not compete at 1000 yards, articles listed under Primer, Reloading and Basics will certainly open your eyes about reloading and shooting consistency that go far beyond what's typically discussed on THR and other gun forums.

And on Match shooters' pet loads page, you get to "glean" actual long-range match loads and detailed load notes to reference when developing your loads - https://web.archive.org/web/2015031.../01/reloading-western-shooters-pet-loads.html

Enjoy.

(And thank you Mr. Salazar from all of us)
 
Last edited:
I have some great news.

When I started reloading .308 for precision with sorted LC brass by date (Internal water volume varied by year), my mind was blown when I found "The Rifleman's Journal" by Germán A. Salazar. I spent countless days and nights reading through various articles, range tests and in-depth studies of different reloading and shooting variables to optimize accuracy out to 1000 yards for Palma match loads (And I was just trying to shrink my group size at mere 100 yards).

Until the website became "by invitation only" ... Well, great news is that this comprehensive website (That compliments various resource link posts like #40) got archived and became viewable by everyone again (Pages do load slow so be patient but contents are definitely worth the wait).

Here's the home page with articles listed by year - https://web.archive.org/web/20150309205518/http://riflemansjournal.blogspot.com/

Here's the index page with articles grouped by topic - https://web.archive.org/web/2015030...ansjournal.blogspot.com/p/articles-index.html

Even though you may not compete at 1000 yards, articles listed under Primer, Reloading and Basics will certainly open your eyes about reloading and shooting consistency that go far beyond what's typically discussed on THR and other gun forums.

And on Match shooters' pet loads page, you get to "glean" actual long-range match loads and detailed load notes to reference when developing your loads - https://web.archive.org/web/2015031.../01/reloading-western-shooters-pet-loads.html

Enjoy.

(And thank you Mr. Salazar from all of us)
Those links aren’t working for me. When I click on any of them, the “way back machine” page says there is no archived page for that url.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top