Ugliest Revolver

Ugliest Revolver

  • Webley MkIV

    Votes: 8 4.3%
  • Chiappa Rhino

    Votes: 109 58.9%
  • Nagant Revolver

    Votes: 49 26.5%
  • Other (Write-In)

    Votes: 19 10.3%

  • Total voters
    185
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

InkEd

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
2,575
Location
Parts Unknown
There are many beautiful revolvers like the SAA, Python, Redhawk, Combat Masterpiece, Model 60, etc. This thread is NOT about those guns. It is about their cross-eyed, toothless, acne scarred and overweight hideous cousins. I want to know what you guys think is the UGLIEST revolver.

Feel free to post pics to support your vote.
 
Tastes vary. You mention the Redhawk as one of the most beautiful. To me all Ruger DA revolvers are ugly as mudhens.
 
My write-in is the Thunder Five, the original .45LC/.410 revolver, as seen in "Three Kings".

It was made locally and basicly looked as though they neglected to polish or finish the raw casting or forging of the frame.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIL_Thunder_5

Come to think of it, RG 10 and Clerke First are looks deficient too, but Thunder 5 was actually taken seriously in some quarters, which makes its ugliness more unforgivable. The Montenegrin school of revolvers are something else too.
 
Last edited:
Both the Nagant and the Webley have something more than looks, they got history.
It's like saying the 1911 is ugly. From a non-biased perspective I would have to agree. But the history of that handgun makes it one of the most favored out there.
 
While the poll entrants are definitely unusual looking, I don't think I'd go so far as "ugly", so I voted for "other"
 
Chiappa Rhino looks like a flare gun that happens to shoot 357s. Function trumps looks. :p
 
ruger super redhawk in the long barrel variation. It looks like they welded on the extra barrel as an afterthought.

The rhino is merely unconventional.
 
I'll second the Thunder 5 revolver. What an ugly mess. The Taurus Judge is no queen, but the Thunder 5 makes it look svelte in comparison.
 
I rather like the looks of the Nagant and Webley revolvers...I don't find them in the slightest bit ugly. That said, I don't find Glocks ugly either so as always it seems to be a matter of personal preference. I bought my Nagant revolver on a whim and I'm really happy I did...it's also helped suck me into the world of wheel guns from autoloaders. I guess that makes it a "gateway revolver" and thus beginning a new collecting addiction :D.
 
The model 10 doesn't fit in this category at all, IMO. It's plain and basic, not ugly.

I would say the Nagant, but it has a practical charm.

So I'd say the Rhino. What were they thinking??
 
Ugly in a revolver is very subjective...I like the term less appealing to the eye and even that is a matter of learned aesthetics

Of the ones you've offered, I find the Nagant Revolver the most unsettling due to it's disjointed lines. As mentioned in your OP and already commented on by SaxonPig, I too find the Ruger Redhawk (and the GP-100) to have very unsettling lines that seem uncompleted
 
Most handguns are ugly but 'Rhino' is uglier then most. Although it is among less handsome weapons the Webley .38/200 auto-ejector was the best military sidearm of WWII.
 
S&W model 10.

Uh? You a commie or somethin'? :D (J/K Don't get radical and think I'm serious)

I thought about the Smith top breaks, the Rhino is pretty fugly, but voted for the Nagant which is ugly in looks AND function far as I'm concerned. Its trigger is all, but unusable in SA OR DA, and hey, I'm the guy that LIKES my Kel Tec P11's trigger! :D

But, whatever. But, heck, the M10 defines the DA revolver, does it not? Try as I might, I can find nothing ugly about it. As already said, though, it's in the eye of the beholder.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top