stevereno1
Member
I'm also growing old with the old "I had to defend myself today/last night/last november" threads. Those stories are mostly made up-soldier of fortune crap.
Ah, so the OP's real premise finally appears ... just another Glocks are better than 1911s waste of bandwidth. I do feel sorry for the many thousands of folks that carry 1911s daily, both for personal defense or professionally, who have no clue that 1911s are untrustworthy fossils.Get a life! the 1911 is a fossil, that is fun to shoot, but not to be trusted for ccw protection-carry.
Yep, a two piece design that has been working for the past 97 years.The 1911's feed ramp is Two-Piece!
Mustangs don't have polymer frames though...An old model T works great, if it has a 2008 mustang drive train, power locks, windows, suspension, interior etc...
Sure, I guess that is why more police officers, United States Armed Forces and Civilians have carried the 1911 throughout its history than can ever be said for Gaston's red-headed Austrian...Get a life! the 1911 is a fossil, that is fun to shoot, but not to be trusted for ccw protection-carry.
Get a life! the 1911 is a fossil, that is fun to shoot, but not to be trusted for ccw protection-carry.
i'm about sick of this thread. is their a more pointless topic of conversation, then bashing two perfectly good, reliable firearms?
Well, there was the photographic proof that other manufacturers have more chamber support than Glocks... that was something to be learned for those with open minds.Just the same giants of intellect getting together for another Glock bashing party. Nothing to be learned, nothing to be gained, nothing to hang around for...