Demi-human
maybe likes firearms a little bit…
I haven't see a rifle more beautiful than a red polymer stocked Savage Rascal, when I gave it to my little bear and he looked up and said "This is mine!?", with a smile ear to ear.
Oh, I wouldn't base any gun purchase on what someone else thought was aesthetically pleasing, I was just curious.
I guess I'm clearly in the minority, as I don't like wood on my guns at all. Black synthetic stock with a matte stainless barrel is what gets me going with long guns. With handguns, I prefer all black, and the blockier the better. A Glock is a thing of beauty to me.
(is blockier a word?)
WOW, just wow. I think you answered the "whats pretty question".View attachment 773151This..... And the same thing in a Mannlicher Stock. However, this is not something I would take to the woods.
Actually, the Mauser action, once widely copied, is almost extinct in new production. The controlled feed, non-rotating extractor is simply too expensive for a $300 rifle.....are there any non-Mauser action bolt guns still in production
The eye of the beholder, as with all things.
IME, (and Ive got 3 chromed parade rifles) chrome of any sort doesn't stick to guns all that well, but ya, black chrome would be neat.Beauty that is only skin deep is a waste in a firearm. If your unwilling to use it for its purpose because its beautiful I think you are missing the point.
I'm not a fan of scroll work on anything that doesn't have two barrels.
The problem with blueing is that as a form of rust prevention it sucked. Sort of surprised black chrome never took off.
I don't think a Glock is ugly, its not good looking either but the Gen 1s and 2s had clean lines. An elegance of function that frankly has been completely lost in a quest for grip by just about every gun manufacturer. I don't disagree with their reasons though. A hand gun is nothing more than a tool to me. When I first heard about barbecue guns I thought that was the stupidest thing I had ever heard of.
The men that started the Barbecue gun custom were hard men that used guns as tools of their trade. They were Texas Rangers. A Barbecue was a big event back in the day and people would dress their best. Some Rangers went all out and would wear a fancy tooled leather rig with a fancy sidearm. These side arms were a thing of beauty and would catch the eyes of many. But they were also a working tool if needed.A hand gun is nothing more than a tool to me. When I first heard about barbecue guns I thought that was the stupidest thing I had ever heard of.
You can say the same thing about camouflage. Then it got adopted by yahoos and wannabes.The men that started the Barbecue gun custom were hard men that used guns as tools of their trade. They were Texas Rangers. A Barbecue was a big event back in the day and people would dress their best. Some Rangers went all out and would wear a fancy tooled leather rig with a fancy sidearm. These side arms were a thing of beauty and would catch the eyes of many. But they were also a working tool if needed.
You can say the same thing about camouflage. Then it got adopted by yahoos and wannabes.
You mean gun porn of course!Just like pornography, you know ugly when you see it.
I agree. For me too - function trumps form almost every time. However, I have a few guns that are both "beautiful" (IMO) in form and function.What makes a gun "beautiful"
Holes in the center of the target and game in the freezer.
Its better looking than what replaced it but I don't really think it was good looking. Design wise it had serious faults. Never ever give a soldier a gun that you can put a part in backwards, because he will.I would not know. I find the M60 beautiful but it is otherwise known as the "pig".