Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter) and gun phobia

Status
Not open for further replies.

ZeSpectre

Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
5,502
Location
Deep in the valley
'Harry Potter's' Daniel Radcliffe in 'My Boy Jack'

Interesting article on Daniel Radcliffe playing Rudyard Kipling's son jack in a new TV movie (I'm watching it now, it's excellent).

Emphasis added to the article by me.

BY JOHN CROOK | Zap2it.com
April 20, 2008

As the star of the " Harry Potter" movies, Daniel Radcliffe has eluded supernatural danger and even near-death at the hands of Lord Voldemort and his minions, but the actor faces the very real horrors of World War I in "My Boy Jack," a wrenching "Masterpiece Theatre" drama premiering Sunday at 9 p.m. on WNET/13.

Radcliffe stars as John "Jack" Kipling, the only son of Rudyard Kipling, the jingoistic British author of "Gunga Din," who loudly thumped the military drums for the British Empire and exhorted young men to fight for king and country, even though he himself never had seen combat.

Underage and woefully nearsighted when World War I breaks out in 1914, Jack yearns to join the combat, not realizing the horrors that are unfolding on the killing fields of France. Rudyard (David Haig), who yearns to live out his own frustrated military fantasies through Jack, ultimately pulls a series of strings to get his myopic son an officer's commission to the Irish Guards, over the angry objections of his American-born wife, Carrie ( Kim Cattrall), who sees all too clearly that Rudyard's patriotic mania is putting their son in grave danger.

In 1915, shortly after turning 18, Jack is reported missing in combat, driving Carrie to rage against her husband, who is tormented by his own sense of guilt.

"Jack does believe in the king and country thing," Radcliffe says during a break in filming "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince," "but I think he also wants very much to prove himself to be a man, both in the eyes of his father and to himself, and also to escape from a situation that makes him feel horribly trapped.

"Rudyard wants the best for his son, but it's what he considers best. That's the crux of it. He had very firm, immutable beliefs about what being a young man is all about, and in some ways they were quite old-fashioned and romantic even way back then - all his ideas about pride and manhood. It may be a simplistic way to think of it, but Rudyard in some respects was a pushy parent who wanted to live out his dreams through Jack."

Beating his gun phobia

Preparing to play the combat-ready Jack Kipling meant that Radcliffe had to master his intense phobia of guns, putting in long hours of training with experts on the set.

"I think I was the most nervous person around firearms that they had ever seen," the actor says. "I wasn't going to pull a trigger, even if there were blanks in the gun, without asking someone twice if they were sure it was safe. It took me a while to get comfortable with holding a gun, because I've never done that in my life, except a BB gun. I found it very frightening, actually. I hadn't realized that blanks can do a hell of a lot of damage, which sort of makes me think twice about the end of 'Crash.'"

There also wasn't a lot of glamour waiting for Radcliffe as he filmed the combat scenes (with Ireland standing in for France) that required him and his co-stars to spend hours being pelted with freezing rain.

"Actually, it was absolutely glorious," Radcliffe says. "All the actors took it upon themselves that they could hack it as well as the army boys could, and indeed we did. It was so cold and so wet because they were using rain machines, and the rain that comes out is doubly heavy to normal rain because it reads better on camera. A couple of the army boys actually ended up getting hypothermia and pneumonia.

"When people occasionally would bring trays of tea and coffee down into the trenches where we were filming, I just took it and poured it over my hands to warm them up. I'm not sure whether that is actually advisable, but it did keep me much warmer than I would have been otherwise. It stopped mattering very quickly that I had played Harry Potter. After a while no one cared because we were all soaked through and freezing, and we were just trying to make each other laugh. It was totally life-affirming and great fun."

>snip<
 
Good on him for getting over his fear.

On a side note, I always thought it was funny that every character in the Harry Potter books carries a deadly weapon with them at all times.
 
Yeah, a phobia is an irrational fear.
Like hidden purple homosexual hippopotomai.
Not that I, um, think they exist...:uhoh:
 
I think the blanks bit is referring to the fact the the armorer on the set would have drilled into the cast something like the four rules of gun safety.

Even blanks cain maim or kill up close just from the blast pressure, not to mention any stray stone or clump mud that might get in the barrel.

Remember actor Brandon Lee ("The Crow"), killed by a squib that had lodged in the barrel, which was then launched by a blank?
 
Well he is from the UK, he probably just hasn't had alot of exposure to firearms.
And don't forget Jon Erik Hexum in addition to Brandon Lee
 
I'm working the night shift so I had my wife record it. I'll be off in a couple of hours and I plan on going home and watching it.

The commerical I saw on PBS shows him using what looks like the classic Webley Mk VI revolver.
 
an .303 blank will definitely hurt
talking to a movie armourer I know he would rather work with an actor who was phobic about guns than someone who thought blanks can't kill.
 
Watched this movie over the past weekend. All in all, I thought it was pretty good. Radcliffe plays John Kipling as a dedicated officer who leads from the front rather than trying to "push a string". The character is dedicated to mastering the rifle, even going out for extra range time with the Musketry Instructor. After he is commissioned, he takes the firing line with his new recruits and shows them that their skinny, young 2nd "Leftenant" can hit what they can't.
 
It was a good movie, but it is a tear jerker. Finally got around to watching it this morning. Strong stuff.

Soldiering is tough business in the best of times ( 1986 - 2000 U.S. Army ) but the fellas on the Western Front in WW1. Ugh.
 
I liked this movie. It has the even pace one might associate with a play, but still manages to work as a tv movie. The shooting scenes, with Radcliffe practicing in the rain, were some of my favorites. It's interesting the part Kipling's fame played as far as influencing his son's enlistment opportunities.

I think it was written by the same man who played Kipling senior.
 
I hadn't realized that blanks can do a hell of a lot of damage
Wait, what?
Wasn't there an actor who killed himself when he held a pistol against his temple and fired a blank? IIRC the either the pressure itself caused a fatal brain injury or it forced a piece of his skull into his head.

Edited to add: Posts 12 & 13 above. Is that the actor I think I remember?
 
Last edited:
Wait, what?

Even with no bullet, blanks still manage to generate a significant amount of pressure. At contact and close to contact distances, this pressure is enough to be lethal.

Out to ten yards, there is exists the risk of being burned or injured (specifically in the eyes) by bits of flying gunpowder that weren't completely consumed in the barrel of the blank-firing weapon.
 
This discussion reminds me of Tigerland, where Colin Farrell unscrews his flank firing adapter slightly and burns the guy who wants to go home.
 
Edited to add: Posts 12 & 13 above. Is that the actor I think I rememebr?

Yes. According to imdb.com, Jon-Erik Hexum jokingly put a .44 magnum revolver loaded with blanks to his temple and pulled the trigger. The wad from the blank shattered his skull. After five hours of surgery, he was declared brain-dead.
 
Sounds like this young man got a great education in firearms. That's one more British actor who can hopefully be a voice for firearms in his home country.

Springmom
 
Sounds like this young man got a great education in firearms. That's one more British actor who can hopefully be a voice for firearms in his home country.

Springmom

I don't think guns bear the same relevancy to people who can afford a mansion and 24/7 bodyguards though, but I hope you're right.
 
I remember that guy getting killed. Shot the wadding into his own head. It didn't penetrate the skull but actually hit him so hard it ended up being a blunt ofrce trauma death.

Too bad, I seem to remember that show being pretty good.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top