How Much Capacity Is Needed?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have never heard of a civilian self defense shooting needing more than three or four rounds, and I think I’m being generous. Surely never heard of one needing to reload. And there are hundreds of documented incidents of these. And it’s not 51% never had too, it’s like 99.9999%!

To quote war saying is just folks trying to justify their “load out.” LOL And you can carry what you want want, or you can post on the internet what you say you are carrying. But I really doubt real people are going around armed with two pistols and five magazines. But never say never.

And besides lots of ammo, I always wondered:
1) do they have fire extinguishers?
2) do they drive a Volvo?
3) do they have a USCCA membership?
3A) if not, do they have a lawyer on retainer?
3B) if so has said lawyer OKed their “load out”?
4) do they not smoke or eat fatty foods?
5) do they have six months or income in their emergency savings?
6) oil changed and tires rotated on time?
7) do they know what an IFAK means? And can they properly use a SWAT-T?

They seem really focused on such a once in a thousand lifetime possibility of getting caught in a fire fight in downtown USA without a reload or CAS, but will probably die of diabetes or stroke or a heart attack due to their lifestyle.

Lefty
Wasn't a man using a 357 single action engaging a man that had a cop pinned down with an ar-15? I remember him firing all six rounds. I could be wrong though. I believe he was over one hundred yards away too.
 
a friend of mine just got a permit in NY to carry. he was asking me about what groups are good. I asked him at what range. He said 75 yards - and I said for self defense practice, at 75 yard, run! practice groups at 15 feet or so to start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LNK
One needs to be equipped for the threat they think they'll meet.

If I knew I might be facing a Mumbai shooting I'd carry 2 15rd 9mms, an AR, and plenty of magazines. That is not the case. 99% of the time I feel adequately armed with a 5 or 6 shot revolver or more often a 7 shot 380 with at least one reload. I feel confident that will deal with what I'm confronted with.If I'm going to a high crime area I'll carry a 15rd 9mm, spare magazines, and a BUG.

If one thought they were going to need a pistol at all they wouldn't go there, right.
Yes, some areas are inherently more dangerous than others, but people are mobile.
I'm not carrying for the friendly people I typically encounter walking the dogs in my "good area" - threat(s) anticipated to come from elsewhere.
Since threats are anticipated to come from elsewhere, the elsewhere gun gets carried everywhere.

If I had to defend myself, I would prefer a Glock 23 rather than a 380, regardless of location.
Do I think I need a Glock 23 + spare mag walking the dogs? No, I sure hope not; I don't expect to need a handgun at all.
Equipped for the threat I think I'll meet - I don't expect any threat.
If I have to defend myself, the pistol I would prefer in hand is not reduced because I'm standing in a nice spot.
Anticipated threat? Yea. I anticipate that if defending against a threat(s) I want at least a Glock 23/32 in hand, wherever.
I can't predict the actions of criminals/psychos, but I can (and do) carry a pistol I'd prefer in hand to defend myself, wherever, whenever.
crystal ball.jpg
 
If one thought they were going to need a pistol at all they wouldn't go there, right.
Yes, some areas are inherently more dangerous than others, but people are mobile.
I'm not carrying for the friendly people I typically encounter walking the dogs in my "good area" - threat(s) anticipated to come from elsewhere.
Since threats are anticipated to come from elsewhere, the elsewhere gun gets carried everywhere.

If I had to defend myself, I would prefer a Glock 23 rather than a 380, regardless of location.
Do I think I need a Glock 23 + spare mag walking the dogs? No, I sure hope not; I don't expect to need a handgun at all.
Equipped for the threat I think I'll meet - I don't expect any threat.
If I have to defend myself, the pistol I would prefer in hand is not reduced because I'm standing in a nice spot.
Anticipated threat? Yea. I anticipate that if defending against a threat(s) I want at least a Glock 23/32 in hand, wherever.
I can't predict the actions of criminals/psychos, but I can (and do) carry a pistol I'd prefer in hand to defend myself, wherever, whenever.
View attachment 1008846

To each his own.
 
I truly hate threads like this one and “minimum caliber you should carry” ones.
I don’t really care what folks carry or how much of it, and nor do I care what they think about what I carry. And yet I almost post in them. Why? Good question. Maybe it’s because I’m laid up recouping from shoulder surgery and haven’t been able to do poo in the barn or kennel for the last month.

Hahaha! I feel the same and am posting for the same reason; recovering from having surgery on my right shoulder. Can't work, can't get out and do much so here I am!:rofl: Still, it's interesting to see why people carry what they do. Normally I carry an HK P2000 loaded up 13+1 with a spare mag on my belt. Occasionally in very hot weather I'll carry my Beretta Nano with 8+1 and a spare mag on my belt. The risks don't change when it's hot but being human I will bow somewhat to comfort and convenience; the thinner, lighter Nano can be concealed easily under just a T-shirt.

But right now I can't draw or shoot a sidearm with my right hand. The only option I've found that allows me to be armed is a left-handed belly band for my Ruger LCRx in .38 Special. My operation was about 4 months ago and I'm getting some more function back but I'm not 100% sure I could manipulate the slide on an auto if I had to clear a malfunction. The LCRx only holds five rounds but I figure better five that are pretty reliable than eighteen out of my VP9 that I might not be able to operate. It may be enough or may not, but since I'm temporarily disabled it's my best option. Luckily I've always done some weak hand practice so I'm reasonably competent just using my left. My right arm functions enough to reload the gun, just can't raise it to shoulder level yet.
 
Hahaha! I feel the same and am posting for the same reason; recovering from having surgery on my right shoulder. Can't work, can't get out and do much so here I am!:rofl: Still, it's interesting to see why people carry what they do. Normally I carry an HK P2000 loaded up 13+1 with a spare mag on my belt. Occasionally in very hot weather I'll carry my Beretta Nano with 8+1 and a spare mag on my belt. The risks don't change when it's hot but being human I will bow somewhat to comfort and convenience; the thinner, lighter Nano can be concealed easily under just a T-shirt.

But right now I can't draw or shoot a sidearm with my right hand. The only option I've found that allows me to be armed is a left-handed belly band for my Ruger LCRx in .38 Special. My operation was about 4 months ago and I'm getting some more function back but I'm not 100% sure I could manipulate the slide on an auto if I had to clear a malfunction. The LCRx only holds five rounds but I figure better five that are pretty reliable than eighteen out of my VP9 that I might not be able to operate. It may be enough or may not, but since I'm temporarily disabled it's my best option. Luckily I've always done some weak hand practice so I'm reasonably competent just using my left. My right arm functions enough to reload the gun, just can't raise it to shoulder level yet.

Question, why can't you operate a VP9 or P2000 with only your left hand? Clearance drills can be done with your belt and the rear sights (and it sounds like you have time to practice) and the slide stop is ambidextrous.

Though, if you get to the point you need to reload that snubby is likely long out of ammo anyway.

Not saying you're wrong, what works for you is great! Just asking about your reasoning.
 
Man, there's a lot of BS in that first post.

First, there's no way to predict how many rounds will be required.

Second, there is data showing that there is no big advantage in effectiveness with larger calibers. (Except in % incapacitation failure with calibers 32 and less. See below.)

In fact, the data show that 380 Auto, 38 Special, 32 Long and Auto, 357 Magnum (and 357 SIG) and 22 rimfire all required less rounds, on average, than a 45 to incapacitate the attacker. That's actual data, not wishful thinking. The 45 is not magical. Really.

Resources:
http://www.activeresponsetraining.net/an-alternate-look-at-handgun-stopping-power

https://www.police1.com/officer-sho...5-rounds-of-ammo-on-the-job-clGBbLYpnqqHxwMq/


Thank you = I was about to post a simular article.

As to the poster who stated he NEVER saw an article about a homeowner or citizen needing to reload or needing more than 3 rounds = READ MORE !!!.

Retired LEO here,I carry what I damned well please,and what I hope I never need.
 
There was a video of a female homeowner, engaging two, IIRC, opponents with a semi and firing more than three rounds. This is going the usual way of this common thread. You probably will never be in a gun fight, you probably will not fire a gun in a DGU - that's the 'average, mode, median'. Go with Joe and no gun for Yo.
 
I do for now. The safety notch was making me nervious and to get myself to actually carry it, I just went with 4.

Fair enough. I carried my first NAA with 5 empty cases until I trusted the safety notch completely. I have noticed you can't tell by sight if the hammer is inside the notch on the cylinder or not. But if your hammer is in the right spot in the notch, the cylinder won't spin. So that safety check works for me.
 
Here is the simplified answer. The number of rounds needed is between 0 and one more then you have on hand. Most likely just drawing the gun will make them flee, could be one shot fired will be enough, or you could empty the clip, empty, the spare, and the backup, and need one more round. You will never know till/if it happens. Carry what you are comfortable with that fits whatever scenarios you think you may encounter and odds are you will be fine, unless you aren’t.

It is impossible to determine what you may encounter in any area, at any given time, and what the bad guy(s) intent and level of determination will be. The best you can do is carry something, be proficient with it, and be aware of your surroundings. Don’t go to bad places at bad times, don’t associate with bad people, and if that little voice in the back of your head says “you need to leave”, get outta there.
 
Another capacity thread? Perennial topic.

Suit yourself.

My retirement CCW choices include revolvers that hold 5-6rds, and pistols that use 6-12rd magazines. My choices are predicated upon the training and experiences of my LE time, which included more than a couple decades of training and serving as a LE firearms instructor.

I have reasons for my own choices, and no concern regarding the choices (and reasons) of others.

I do have an opinion that more gun owners who anticipate a potential need for using their guns for self defense would benefit from some formal firearms training, and acquiring a working knowledge of the laws of self defense, but again, that's their concern and problem.
 
Sadly we know most civilians who carry have little to none realistic quality training.
 
Enough to competently use the firearm.
Enough to understand the legal aspects
FOF to experience some of the firearms usage and dealing the the law in a well scripted simulation.
 
How much training is enough?
Dang this equation is getting complex.

The answer to that question is seemingly learned by a dismaying number of folks the hard way.

To borrow a bit of folksy "wisdom" among gun owners, and apply it to training .... Better to have it and not need it, than need it and not have it. ;)
 
Question, why can't you operate a VP9 or P2000 with only your left hand? Clearance drills can be done with your belt and the rear sights (and it sounds like you have time to practice) and the slide stop is ambidextrous.

Though, if you get to the point you need to reload that snubby is likely long out of ammo anyway.

Not saying you're wrong, what works for you is great! Just asking about your reasoning.

To be honest I've not done a ton of clearance drills with one hand and it's hard to do them now. I can't wear a belt (can't buckle it) so that one's out. Also I have no left-hand holsters for any of my guns. I could buy one but by the time I get it I'll probably have my right arm back, and in any case the P2000 and VP9 are both too heavy to wear without the belt I can't buckle. Lastly the LCRx is a lot lighter which is easier to shoot with my weak hand.

As the mods have been hammering home, the odds that I'll need the gun are relatively low to begin with. Woods carry is another matter entirely since we have a lot of Grizzlies here. I'll be avoiding the woods though til my arm is a bit better (not really safe to hike since I can't use trekking poles and a fall would leave me with a strong likelihood of needing a full shoulder replacement).
 
To be honest I've not done a ton of clearance drills with one hand and it's hard to do them now. I can't wear a belt (can't buckle it) so that one's out. Also I have no left-hand holsters for any of my guns. I could buy one but by the time I get it I'll probably have my right arm back, and in any case the P2000 and VP9 are both too heavy to wear without the belt I can't buckle. Lastly the LCRx is a lot lighter which is easier to shoot with my weak hand.

As the mods have been hammering home, the odds that I'll need the gun are relatively low to begin with. Woods carry is another matter entirely since we have a lot of Grizzlies here. I'll be avoiding the woods though til my arm is a bit better (not really safe to hike since I can't use trekking poles and a fall would leave me with a strong likelihood of needing a full shoulder replacement).

Makes sense, thanks for answering.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top