Hydraulic recoil spring?

Status
Not open for further replies.
"The bullet's forward drag on the barrel affects the slide's acceleration because it resists the barrel's rearward movement"
Only because it robs from the bullet's acceleration/peak momentum, though (they are two sides of the same coin ya'll are arguing about :neener:)

"That's how the guy was able to easily keep the slide from moving"
I'm gonna dispute this exact phrase, but not the general idea. I posit to you that slide moved just as much as it normally would before camming down --because the whole purpose of that initially locked portion is to absorb all the crazy-gnarly bolt-thrust forces from acting on the slide alone. I'll bet the barrel fully decoupled and was arrested before his thumb stopped the remainder of movement (because, as you mentioned earlier, the whole purpose of the slide's momentum after unlocking is to facilitate ejection/feeding, which our hands are obviously more than capable of doing, even very quickly).

Looking at the angle of his thumb knuckle before and after, he either had to:
- apply a ton of thumb force to stop the slide only after ignition, which is doubtful because our reaction time is nowhere near that fast
- bend his thumb slightly as the slide recoiled 1/10th of an inch or so, scooting it down the tail of the slide a bit in the process ;)

Super Hi-Speed would be really helpful for this little foible, though :cool:

"and why he couldn't do the same thing with a blowback that has the same slide mass and spring"
If the slide had the same mass as the locked-breech gun + barrel, and then arrested the barrel's share of the slide momentum like the locked breech gun, I submit he would have stopped the slide ~10% more than the locked breech one (because of the roughly 10% contribution of barrel friction to the slide of a blowback that is 'hidden' by the locked-breech action)

TCB
 
"In a 1911, what is it that locks the breech?"
The upward camming action that forces the lugs to engage one another, and the relatively-infinitesimal (compared to bolt thrust) forces/couples that act off axis of the same lugs aren't sufficient to decouple them before pressures drop to ambient :)

TCB
 
"In a 1911, what is it that locks the breech?"
The upward camming action that forces the lugs to engage one another, and the relatively-infinitesimal (compared to bolt thrust) forces/couples that act off axis of the same lugs aren't sufficient to decouple them before pressures drop to ambient :)

TCB
Where does this upward camming action come from?
 
Are we sure of that? Because blowbacks almost uniformly have much harsher recoil than locked-breech guns, simply because the shooter is exposed to all of it at the same time

Yes, I'm sure of it.

And the sharper felt recoil from a blowback is mostly due to the stiffer spring.

I understand all that you're saying. Maybe I'm wording it badly, but I don't think you understand what I'm saying.

Go back and look at those damaged lugs. Without a heavy opposing/shearing force, they wouldn't have deformed like that.

I swear to God, I don't know how else I can explain this, but I'll try.

Imagine that you're a super-strong micro man between the base of the bullet and the breechblock. Your arms are long enough to push the bullet out of the barrel.

You stand between the bullet and the slide/bolt and push them in opposite directions...pushing them apart. You'll feel the bullet resist your efforts as it moves through the barrel from friction. You'll also feel the slide resist your efforts as the barrel is pulled backward over the bullet.

Because...

Whatever resistance the barrel places on the bullet, the bullet places on the barrel. Force forward/force backward.

And because the slide recoils...grabs the barrel by the lugs and hauls it backward...whatever resists the barrel's backward movement resists the slide's backward movement.

The internal frictional forces don't go away.

And I'm really gonna go to sleep now. It's been a long day.
 
Snarkity alert.

[comment retracted by author. Mod, help out with the title?]
 
Last edited:
"20,000psi. That's what he stopped with one thumb...not momentum"
Again, conflating force (pressure in this case) with momentum. I know they're related, through a tedious/tortuous path of mathematics, but they are not the same thing. Comparing them directly ignores a lot of factors.

He most certainly did not stop 20,000psi X the area of a 9mm case head with his thumb; that's ~764 lbs. His thumb acted like a really strong recoil spring, which we all know will cause a gun to fail to fully cycle at some point. Because the thumb can exert 40lbs or so (and itself does not have inconsequential mass, being a blob of tissue and bone) it can arrest the slide far more quickly than a 12lb spring --which, how does that work exactly? 12lbs minimum or maximum? :confused:.

The work, the force times distance, done by his thumb was equal to the change in kinetic energy (i.e. the velocity) of the slide once decoupled (or the slide+barrel if you think he stopped it before the barrel lug did). If you think about how much more violently a bullet cycles a semi than a slide drop, which isn't all that much, it makes intuitive sense your thumb can absorb that energy without serious injury

On a blowback, where there is 10% or so more slide momentum (which corresponds to a substantial increase in kinetic energy) and nothing to arrest part of the moving mass before the cycle completes --yeah, I can see your thumb having a harder time :p (It seems unlikely it'd be anything but sprained, though; ligaments are pretty damn strong). This also explains why small bits of tissue/skin caught in the path of the slide both stand no chance, and often don't even interrupt the cycle :eek:

TCB
 
Knock it off, Gloob, I'm having fun; don't harsh my mellow :p

"Go back and look at those damaged lugs. Without a heavy opposing/shearing force, they wouldn't have deformed like that."
Obviously; it's the same internal tensile forces from breech-face thrust against slide/barrel momentum pulling them together that seek to rip the nose off the slide as it is thrust backward; just focused into far, far smaller area. Thus it fails before the rest (one hopes :eek:)

The impasse we seem to be at appears the result of different ways of approaching/modeling the problem;
-You have the momentum conservation crowd
-And the force balance crowd
The former does not account for frictional losses, which would seem to be ~10% of the bolt thrust or maybe a little more
The latter does not account for temporal effects, i.e. the effect of force over time imparting momentum to an unbalanced system; force balance only works in a static system

For complex moving systems with losses like friction, you have to go to a work-based calculation. I had to use this method to calculate efficiency and thrust curves for a four-stage turbo-fan engine as a class project in college, from only ambient atmospheric conditions and the compression efficiency factors for each stage; if it works for something that obnoxious, Browning's marvel should be a cakewalk (not that'd I'd actually volunteer to run numbers, though :D)

If I were to run the numbers --which again, I will not!
-I would sum all the forces for the bullet, and for the slide/barrel assy
-I would integrate these forces over the distance required for bullet exit or cam down, whichever occurs first by the numbers
-At that point, I would calculate the momentum carried by the slide and barrel individually, and use them to determine extractor and barrel link loads

But I'm not going to :D

TCB
 
barn I still want to know where you think the upward camming action comes from.


And if you don't do the calculations, who will? You seem to be the one that knows which ones to do. And you've done it before. :D
 
Does not the 1911 have a positive mechanical means for raising the barrel up against the slide so the lugs engage while in battery? Tuner said the front face of the barrel underlug contacts the frame to push the barrel up. While under bolt thrust acceleration, the off-axis forces that would seek to drop the barrel away are small enough that either friction or duration prevent significant decoupling of the perpendicular lug faces* (my money's on the former simply because polished/oiled steel is darn near frictionless with a coefficient of like .01 or smaller, which multiplied by the already-small off-axis force may only be in the ounces)

*even the slightest bevel of the lug faces would rapidly generate very strong downward forces on the barrel from the slide, and if the lifting cam surface drops away at a steep angle as the slide recoils, could result in significantly earlier unlocking --which is why the peening Tuner showed exacerbates itself so quickly to the point of failure; the first round peens, the next on drops faster and peens more violently, the next one binds when it tries to go into battery, or drops the lugs under pressure entirely and kabooms.

TCB

"You seem to be the one that knows which ones to do. And you've done it before."
Not unless I'm gettin' paid; it's annoying enough to run them for my stupid designs (and see them fail the action nearly every time :mad:), let alone those of a dead man that have been proven "good enough" for goin' on 100 years, now. It's really a shame universities have no interest in guns, because there's actually a lot of cool, if pointless, research to be funded blindly by grant money :D

TCB
 
The barrel is held in place vertically by the lower lug resting on the slide stop cross pin. A correctly fit link allows the lower lug's forward radius to bear lightly on the slidestop pin as it swings around that radius, and it allows the bottom of the lower lug to cam upward on the pin. And the lower lug is not parallel with the barrel axis but is angled slightly. See pic in post#156.

The lugs rest on the slidestop pin when in battery, but the support is insufficient to keep the barrel in battery once the slide starts to move (the bottom of the lugs are angled so downward motion should start immediately as it slides off the crosspin). The motion of the link at this point is horizontal so it provides no upward support.

So without any vertical force in play, what keeps the slide and barrel locked together once the slide begins to move?
 
It very well may be nothing; depending on the geometry, the "down" force on the barrel may be so small, that the duration of pressurization is not long enough to drag it off the lugs appreciably before the link takes over. Also, I thought the locking lugs would be beveled on the back face, not the front; no geometric reason they can't be perfectly perpendicular on the front face if there's enough bevel/slop on the rear for the barrel to slide back slightly and fall away.

And if the minute amount of friction evolved from the component of bolt thrust that transmits off-axis load to the barrel really is what holds the action closed under pressure; then what? It's by geometric inspection nowhere close to the very humble loads applied by the camming lever, let alone bolt thrust. Even barrel friction has a (somewhat) small impact on lug force compared to the rapidly-accelerating slide trying to tear itself asunder along its length through tension.

"So without any vertical force in play, what keeps the slide and barrel locked together once the slide begins to move?"
In short, I believe it's because there aren't really any vertical forces worth writing home about :)

Depending on the lifting cam angle on the underlug, the barrel may still be sufficiently supported against dropping down even after recoiling back. I don't have a 1911 (or one in front of me), so how far can the barrel drop after only .05" of slide travel? If it's less than .01", that probably doesn't have a meaningful impact on the lugs' engagement/disengagement/load capacity/galling/peening.

TCB
 
So....
Apparently 16" 1911 barrels are a thing (I'm more puzzled than surprised) :confused:

1317854_01_colt_1911_1991a1_carbine_640.jpg

Couple questions:
-While the bullet dwells in the barrel 3X as long, I doubt it goes 3X as fast
-The slide/barrel have got to weigh at least twice as much as original
-How in the hell does that foregrip function? It'd either be pitching up and down like a bronco, or reciprocating. Even if stationary, all sorts of accuracy hell would be visited upon the shooter when that barrel recoils
-Do these crazy things even function?
-Why? (and I'm a guy who rarely asks "why?")

TCB
 
barnbwt said:
"So without any vertical force in play, what keeps the slide and barrel locked together once the slide begins to move?"
In short, I believe it's because there aren't really any vertical forces worth writing home about

Exactly. So if there are no vertical forces to produce an upward camming action to lock the barrel and bolt once the slide begins to move when the gun is fired, what does it? Because they are locked together when the gun is fired.

They are not locked when hand cycling the slide. In battery yes, locked, no. (not exactly like the R51, where the breechblock is locked by pressure on the block by the casehead but not when handcycling, but similar enough to illustrate the difference)

You suggested they are locked by pressure. How is that pressure exerted? Against what surfaces? In the 1911, the barrel is tethered to the frame by the link, but not fixed in place so it is free to move rearward with the slide. But it doesn't. Instead it resists the slide as shown by the wear on the lugs over several thousand rounds.

What causes this resistance? Inertia? I don't think the barrel has sufficient mass. So what is it other than the friction/drag of the bullet?

I fully agree that the drag on the barrel is countered by the drag on the bullet so the net effect on each is null relative to one another. But the drag on either the bullet or barrel does not speed up the slide. Friction is a resistive force to momentum, it does not produce momentum. Instead, it converts momentum to heat with a net loss of momentum from both side. So again, the net result is null relative to each other.

So while the bullet may be slowed, so is the barrel and the force that slows the barrel resists the slide and keeps the barrel and slide locked together until the force is no longer operative.

And JMB probably took all of this into consideration when he designed the 1911. And he designed it to use 230 gr bullets (max) at a max pressure of 21000 psi. Within these parameters, the gun operates safely. This is proven by over 100 years of use. Change these parameters and the operation changes as well. But...

The net delay may be null, but the delay still exists and both bullet and slide are still delayed. While the bullet is delayed, so is the slide. So the heavier bullet still exits the barrel before the slide reaches the downlink point.

As for a longer barrel, the same still holds. As long as the bullet is in the barrel, the barrel and slide remain locked. A 230gr hardball takes 1.6 ms to exit a 15" barrel. The same time it would take GLOOBs 460gr bullet to exit a 5" barrel. Both would exit before the slide and barrel unlock.
 
Last edited:
barnbwt said:
How in the hell does that foregrip function? It'd either be pitching up and down like a bronco, or reciprocating. Even if stationary, all sorts of accuracy hell would be visited upon the shooter when that barrel recoils

Well, it would only reciprocate at most .25". I don't know, maybe you are supposed to hold real tight and keep the barrel and slide locked until the bullet exits. :evil:
 
"You REMOVE all bullet frictional force when calculating the slide momentum compared to bullet momentum in a locked breech system... right?"

ONLY when calculating bulk slide+barrel numbers. You MUST include the internal factors when calculating the internal lug interface loads.

You and Tuner are in love with your locking lugs. You are over complicating it.

Take a 10 pound cannon and put it on some rails so it slides back and forth without friction.

If you shoot a 1 lb projectile, by the time the cannon goes back 1" on the rail, the projectile will be 10" from it's initial starting point (11" down the barrel). We know this because of the weight of the ball and the weight of the cannon. Furthermore, we know that the speed of the cannon is equal to 1/10th the speed of the projectile, at any given time. We know these things in absence of any other data.

We do not need to know the force on the locking lugs, because there are none. Even if there were locking lugs, we wouldn't care. It doesn't matter. We don't need to know the friction, because it doesn't matter. If we alter the friction of the projectile, it doesn't matter. Friction acts both ways, force forward equals force backward, as some are wont to say. So... it doesn't matter. We don't need to know the actual muzzle velocity, because it doesn't matter. We don't need to know the psi, because it doesn't matter. We don't need to know the actual acceleration curve, because it doesn't matter. We don't need to know the amount of work or "losses due to friction," because guess what? Yeah. It doesn't matter.

Now, fire a 2 lb projectile. By the time the cannon moves back 1", the projectile would have moved 5" from it's starting point. (6" down the barrel). We know this because of the mass of the cannon and the mass of the projectile. Furthermore, we know the speed of the cannon is 1/5th the speed of the projectile at any given point in time. We know this in absence of any other data.

We do not need to take photos of the locking lugs. We do not need to consider Youtube videos showing incorrect animations or rednecks doing stupid-gun-tricks. We do not need a broomstick. We do not need force diagrams. Because guess what? Yeah. None of that matters.

What does this have to do with a locked breech system? Apparently nothing on a gun forum, because there are no locking lugs or friction or cam links or pistons or diagrams.

So let's cut the damn cannon up into an inner sleeve and an outer sleeve that forms the breech. These mate together with locking lugs. Repeat the thought experiment. The results will be the same.

Now, let's put a cammy-piston-locking block on the rail, exactly 1" behind the back of the cannon. When the cannon hits this cammy-piston-locking block, the locking lugs will disengage. Repeat thought experiment. The results will be the same. Even if you take pictures of the locking lugs, it is the same. Even if you pull on a rope and think about it, the result is the same. Even if you increase or decrease the friction of the projectile, the result is the same. (What happens after the breech unlocks, who cares. Up to that point, everything is exactly the same.)
 
Last edited:
I'm gonna give it one more try, and then I'm gonna bail outta this one. I went to bed with a headache last night. This thread was likely the reason.

Before we start, keep these things in mind:

A force in one direction means there's an equal force in the other direction, whether that force is compelling or resisting. If it's a resistive force, It doesn't matter how much compelling force is applied to it. It doesn't matter how quickly the event is over.
That force is in play.

Hypothetically:

Let's lathe-turn a bullet from 4340 round stock that is exactly the same size and shape of a 230-grain round nose jacketed "hardball" bullet. For the sake of simplification, let's assume that it weighs 230 grains, even though it couldn't.

Let's seat it into a case charged with 6 grains of Unique, which would produce about 830-840 fps with a conventional 230-grain bullet. GI hardball spec.

Fire it in a locked breech pistol.

What would happen? Would the slide cycle...or not? If not...why?

And please don't say: "Because it's a locked breech." That's not an explanation.

Now, fire another one just like it in a High Point...the only working straight blowback .45 that I'm aware of. (Besides open bolt pseudo submachine guns like the now defunct Mac 10.)

Would the slide cycle? If it would...why?

I'm all outta words now. You'll either see it, or you won't.

Regards
 
Case 1: the gun goes "bink!", and the bullet stops in the rifling. The slide does not cycle.

Case 2: Hi Point goes "BOOM!" Bullet stops in the rifling. Slide goes back way too fast. Cast ruptures.

Please explain what is the purpose of this experiment?
 
Here's my guess.

You think that case 1 proves that friction reduces slide velocity. And that this reduction in slide velocity makes the 1911 able to fire any bullet without unlocking early. Somehow. Just because. For some reason. Why exactly doesn't matter, because.. well just think about it. The friction will always perfectly balance itself out, so the system is always balanced. Force forward equals force backwards. (And yes, so long as the bullet mass and slide/barrel mass remain fixed, this works out. Lock timing will remain consistent.)

My take is that this example demonstrates that as long as the breech is locked, the top half of your gun acts like a simple cannon. Until that breech opens, it's a simple two piece system that can be easily and accurately described by conservation of momentum.

If the bullet momentum is zero, the slide momentum is zero. Conveniently, the math works out perfectly!

If the bullet has made it 3" down the barrel by the time it stopped, the slide would have moved back by 3"*230gr/17.1oz *16/7000. If you double the mass of the bullet, the slide would have moved back about twice as far. Bullet mass changes everything.

In case two, the breech is unlocked, and the barrel is fixed to the frame. So there are 3 parts. Bullet, frame, and slide. The expanding gases push the slide back (and frame/barrel forward, too). But conservation of momentum is still applicable. It's just that the entire frame jumps forward while the slide jumps backwards. The center of mass doesn't change. The gun doesn't move. Except as it gets propelled from gases escaping from the kB. And any momentum imparted by ejecta including brass bits and the extractor flying off.

You'll either see it, or you won't.
So am I seeing it? Am I not seeing it? Am I dancing around the subject?
 
Last edited:
LMAO!! Don't you just love these 1911tuner threads?

We go over this about once a year. Maybe some day he'll take a basic physics or engineering mechanics class so he doesn't confuse force, mass, acceleration, momentum, recoil, internal vs external forces, and pressure.

We went over all the basic Newtonian equations back in 2011. Haven't seen anything from anyone yet that will change them. Feel free to plug in exact values for slide and barrel weights, unburned powder, slide friction, etc, if it makes you happy!

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?p=7786467&highlight=calculus#post7786467, post #206

If anyone is really interested, you can use Newton’s stuff from 400 years ago to understand how your gun works. We used it to get us to the moon back in the 60’s, we use it on the rockets and guns we’re designing today. If you don’t care to know, don’t worry about it, keep believing whatever makes you happy! No big deal.

For example, how long does your bullet remain in your gun barrel, and what kind of acceleration does the bullet experience?

What kind of acceleration does your slide experience, and how fast is it moving when the bullet exits? How far has the slide moved rearward when the bullet exits?

This kind of stuff is REAL important if you’re designing things like rocket mechanisms or artillery fuses or proximity detonators.

Not real easy to effectively transmit mathematical concepts in a forum format, but we can try. I’m going to ignore the contribution of the unburned powder and gases exiting the barrel with the bullet.

We’ll call the starting position of the bullet the zero of our coordinate system, so X(initial) = 0. We’ll abbreviate it as Xi cause I’m lazy. That means Xi = 0.

V(initial) is the starting velocity. We’ll call that Vi. For a bullet in a gun, it’s initial velocity is 0. So Vi = 0.

We’ll call the last position we consider, the end of the barrel, X(final). I’ll abbreviate that as Xf.

T = time in seconds.
T**2 means “T raised to the second power” or "T squared" or “T x T”.
X = position in inches.
V = velocity in feet per second.
A = acceleration in feet per second squared (fps**2).

The basic motion equation in terms of time is:

Xf = Xi + V x T + (A x T**2) / 2

If you want more on this basic motion equation, you can go here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equations_of_motion

Introductory calculus teaches us that the first derivative of position is velocity, and the first derivative of velocity and the second derivative of position is acceleration (I’m not going into calculus for you).

So Velocity = Vi + Acceleration x Time, or

Vf = Vi + A x T

We’ll look at a typical .45 caliber 1911. First thing we have to do is get everything into common units.

Bullet weight = 230 grains = 230/7000 pounds = .033 pounds = .001025 slugs (slug is mass unit in english system).
Barrel length = 5 inches = 5/12 feet = .417 feet
Bullet velocity when it exits the barrel at 5 inches = 830 feet per second.

Now we just use the basic motion equation:

Xf = Xi + Vi x T + (A x T**2) / 2

Put in our 1911 values that we know:

.417 = 0 + 0 x T + (A x T**2) / 2 or

.417 = (A x T**2) / 2 (NOTE – This will be EQ1)

Notice that we have 2 unknowns (A and T) but so far only one equation. From basic algebra we know that we need as many equations as unknowns if we hope to solve them.

This is where we use the rest of the stuff we know and the velocity equation:

Vf = Vi + (A x T)

We know Vf (Velocity final) is 830 fps. We know Vi (Velocity initial) is 0, so

830 = 0 + (A x T)

Since we loved algebra, we solve for A in the above equation and find

A = 830 / T (NOTE – This will be EQ2)

Now we can cleverly plug the above relationship back into our basic motion equation EQ1, replacing A with 830 / T.

.417 = (830/T) x (T**2) / 2

Simplifying this (basic algebra again) gives

.417 = 415 x T

Now we solve for T:

T = .417/415 = .0010048 seconds

In other words, T is right at 1/1000 of a second.

Since we now know T, we can easily solve for A from EQ2:

A = 830/ T = 830 / .001 = 830,000 feet per second squared.

Acceleration due to gravity = 32.2 fps**2, so our bullet is experiencing:

830,000 / 32.2 = 25776.4 G’s as it goes down the barrel.

Kind of important to know if you want to hang some electronics on your bullet. They better be able to handle more than 25,000 G’s.

How much force is the locked together barrel/slide seeing, and how fast is it accelerating?

We know that the force from the bullet equals its mass times acceleration, and we know that for every force there is an equal and opposite reaction (that Newton stuff again).

So the force delivered to the locked together barrel/slide from the bullet is:

F = M x A

F = mass of bullet x acceleration of bullet

F = .001025 x 830,000 = 851 pounds

How fast will 851 pounds accelerate the barrel/slide?

F = M x A = 851

Algebra again:

A = F / M = 851 / M

I’m going to say 1.5 pounds for the slide and .5 pounds for the barrel, mass would be 2/32.2 = .062 slugs.

So the acceleration of the slide is:

A = 851 / .062 = 13695 feet per second squared.

13,695 / 32.2 = 425.31 G's

Now we know the acceleration, so how fast is the slide moving when the bullet exits the barrel?

We know the bullet is in the barrel for .001 seconds, and once it leaves the barrel there is no more reaction with the gun. So the slide/barrel acceleration is applied for .001 seconds.

V = A x T = 13695 x .001 = 13.695 feet per second.

The slide is moving rearward at 13.7 feet per second when the bullet leaves the barrel.

How far has the slide moved when the bullet leaves the barrel?

Again we use the basic motion equation. Now that we know the acceleration and time, we can find the distance the slide moves:

Xf = Xi + Vi x T + (A x T**2) / 2

Xf = 0 + 0 x .001 + (13695 x .001**2) / 2

Xf = .0068475 feet = .082 inches, or just over 80 thousands of an inch.

You’ll find that with your 1911 slide .082 inches retracted, the barrel and slide will still be locked together. John Browning did all the stuff I did above over 100 years ago (once smokeless powder was invented so everything didn't get gummed up) when he started designing machine guns and semi-automatic pistols.

Recap:

Bullet velocity at barrel exit: 830 fps
Time bullet is in barrel: .001 second
Bullet acceleration while in barrel: 830,000 fps**2, or just over 25,000 G’s.
Slide acceleration while bullet is in barrel: 13,695 fps**2 or just over 425 G's
Slide velocity when bullet exits: 13.7 fps
Distance barrel/slide moves while bullet is in it: .082 inches

Note: The slide is accelerated ONLY while the bullet is in the barrel, so it’s only accelerated for .001 seconds. That’s why GLOOB kept trying to tell you that you couldn’t possibly apply over 850 pounds of force to the barrel to accelerate the slide as fast as the bullet does. You can see where the recoil spring force (16 or 18 pounds or so) is pretty irrelevent while the bullet is accelerating.

Notice that NOWHERE above does bullet/barrel friction come into play. If your 1911 has 10 pounds of barrel friction and a 230 grain bullet exits at 830 fps, it will experience the forces and timing above. If it has 1,000,000 pounds of barrel friction and a 230 grain bullet exits at 830 feet per second, it will also experience the exact same forces and timing above. Chamber pressure will have to be higher and your barrel and slide better be a LOT stronger, but the massive bullet drag will have NO effect on recoil, slide velocity, or slide position because it’s an internal force.

All of the stuff above is freshman year engineering Calculus 1, Physics, and Statics. No way anyone is going to explain it on an internet forum to anyone who does not have the fundamental background to understand it. I can see where it aggravates some people who understand trying to explain it!

Since we know the slide velocity, slide mass, barrel mass, recoil spring rate, and location where the slide unlocks, we could go on to calculate the slide velocity when it unlocks, the barrel velocity when it hits it's hard stop, the slide velocity when it hits it's hard stop in recoil, the time it takes to reach full recoil, and how long it will take to return to battery. We ignored the contribution of the recoil spring, hammer spring, unburnt powder, and gases exiting the barrel. Feel free to add them into the calculations if you feel the need.
 
Last edited:
Those equations seem legit to this engineer, though they do make simplistic assumptions like constant acceleration of the bullet, blah, blah, blah, but probably close enough to the real thing (especially since we're comparing pre-ignition and muzzle exit configurations, the internal ballistics wash out).

Again, the friction does not affect the timing, as the equations shown, the bullet momentum does (and friction reduces bullet momentum), the friction only needs to be determined for the design of the lugs themselves, but the bulk slide/barrel assy couldn't care about that so long as it does not fail.

"What causes this resistance? Inertia? I don't think the barrel has sufficient mass. So what is it other than the friction/drag of the bullet?"
The barrel/slide are under 425G's per the above; pert near 851lbs for a two pound assembly. Plenty to hold things in place by friction if anything will, and that's not even counting the ~100lbs of friction (which you probably wouldn't want to rely upon in case you get an undersized bullet with less of it in there)

In any case, very little of these forces act off-axis on the barrel, so because there is no force upsetting the lug engagement, the lugs remain engaged. The lug load is gone by the time the barrel cams down (which, according to the calcs, is .02" after the bullet leaves, so a good bit of margin for safe timing) so the link doesn't need to work very hard to decouple the barrel from the slide.

And that is why I wasn't going to do the calculations...:D

TCB
 
GLOOB, Tuner,
Y'all keep pitching various hypotheticals, none of which have diagrams or any in depth math to describe what they are supposed to model. The timing of this mechanism is nitty-gritty and delicate enough that you really need to back up your models with hard math. I know, we can "imagine" things to a certain extent, but we're talking .02" of timing clearance here, and trying to determine if a wide range of bullet loads will exceed that; our minds aren't built to do that kind of calculation with any precision.

Also, in the interest of the actual question at hand, hypothetical magic materials to increase friction or mass arbitrarily aren't really helpful to solving the timing question being asked; which, I think had something to do with barrel/slide initial momentum, and whether a hydraulically damped spring could arrest them with a benefit to spring weight required (or something :eek:)

TCB
 
Since we are quoting wiki, this is from the wikipedia article on Friction:

Friction is not itself a fundamental force but arises from fundamental electromagnetic forces between the charged particles constituting the two contacting surfaces. The complexity of these interactions makes the calculation of friction from first principles impractical and necessitates the use of empirical methods for analysis and the development of theory.

And from the article on Empirical Method:

Empirical research is a way of gaining knowledge by means of direct and indirect observation or experience. Empirical evidence (the record of one's direct observations or experiences) can be analyzed quantitatively or qualitatively.

Friction exists. It's effect has been observed in a 1911. Any calculations that do not fully account for that effect are incomplete and can't fully describe real world events. You can't just ignore it and say it doesn't matter. That does not account for it.
 
I am not an engineer and much of the math I may have learned 40 years ago has gone unused for a long time, but 45 Auto's calculations and conclusions appear to support everything I have been thinking (though I may not have been expressing it clearly)...Except for this:

"the massive bullet drag will have NO effect on recoil, slide velocity, or slide position because it’s an internal force."

While true as far as it goes, it does not go far enough. It ignores the effect that the massive bullet drag has on the barrel. The drag is there. It affects both bullet and barrel and drains momentum from both as the momentum is converted to heat. And what affects the barrel, affects the slide. So both sides of the equation are equally affected—what slows the bullet, slows the slide as well. The effect lasts for as long as the friction is in play. It may slow down bullet and slide significantly or it may not, but it affects both equally so the time interval between events is affected equally on both aides. If the bullet leaves the barrel later, the slide reaches linkdown later. Because the linkdown position occurs at the same point in the slides travel, no matter how long it takes for the slide to reach that point. And while it is active, the drag resiatance to the barrel is keeping the barrel and slide locked together.

Is bullet/barrel friction needed to keep the barrel and slide locked in the presence of the other forces in play? Perhaps not. But absence of need does not negate the action or its effects.

As barnbwt noted earlier, JMB designed the 1911 to operated safely within a certain range of parameters. And as noted by 45 Auto as well, it was designed to account for and take advantage of the physical forces at play within these parameters. As long as these parameters are not exceeded, it works as designed. Exceed the parameters, it may or may not work safely or may not run at all.

Were these physical forces calculated precisely? Were all accounted for exactly? I don't know, but given JMBs reputation for visualizing his designs and working from thought experiments, I'm sure he thought they were.

One of these design parameters is the mass of the bullet. Another is the diameter of the bullet. Arguing about the effects of overmass or undersized bullets is arguing outside of the designed operating parameters and I am not arguing about these things. A 1911 may or may not operate under such conditions, but it can't, by definition, operate as designed outside of the design parameters. All I am interested in here is the 1911 (and similarly designed guns of which I have some knowledge which does not include Glocks even though the same arguments may apply) and how it operates within its design parameters.
 
jrh6856 said:
It ignores the effect that the massive bullet drag has on the barrel. The drag is there. It affects both bullet and barrel and drains momentum from both as the momentum is converted to heat.

As long as we start with the given that the bullet has a muzzle velocity of 830 FPS the "massive" bullet drag is NOT ignored. The nominal 830 FPS is what the entire calculation was based upon.

Use a different bullet weight or a different muzzle velocity and you'll get different answers.

Do you agree that the bullet reaches 830 FPS in 5 inches (the length of the barrel)?

If so, then the drag was accounted for.

The bullet has to travel at a constant accelaration of 830,000 feet per second per second to reach a velocity of 830 FPS in 5 inches. Doesn't matter hoew much drag it has. If it doesn't accelerate that fast than it doesn't reach 830 FPS and we're wasting our time.

To reach 830 FPS in 5 inches requires a NET FORCE on the base of the bullet of 851 pounds.

If the bullet has 1 pound of drag, then the force on the base of the bullet is 852 pounds. 1 pound counteracts the drag, the other 851 pounds accelerates the bullet.

If the bullet has 1,000 pounds of drag, then the force on the base of the bullet is 1,851 pounds. 1,000 pounds counteracts the drag, the other 851 pounds accelerates the bullet.

The same NET FORCE of 851 pounds accelerating the bullet forward is also accelerating the slide rearward. That's why it doesn't matter if there's 1 pound or 1,000 pounds of drag on the bullet that reaches 830 FPS at the muzzle. The drag is an INTERNAL force that is reacted in both directions (by the slide and barrel lugs) for a net effect on the bullet of ZERO. The only thing accelerating the bullet AND slide is the net force required to get the bullet to 830 FPS in 5 inches.

Want to see how much drag the nominal bullet in my example had?

Assume a standard 45 ACP chamber pressure of 12,000 PSI. The base of the bullet is .452 in diameter, for an area of .16 square inches. That means that there is a force on the base of the bullet of 12,000 PSI x .16 square inches = 1,925 pounds. However, it only required 851 pounds to accelerate to 830 FPS. That means that the other 1,074 pounds of force on the base of the bullet was counteracting the bullet drag. This internal 1,074 pounds of force on the base of the bullet was (through those lugs again) counteracting 1,074 pounds of recoil force in the slide.

This is why a blowback 45 slide (Highpoint for example) must be much heavier than a recoil-operated slide. It has no mechanical means of counteracting those internal forces, so they are reacted on the slide as an EXTERNAL force. The slide on a blowback operated 45 has the entire 1,925 pounds of force accelerating it rearward so the bullet can accelerate forward with a net force of 851 pounds. The recoil operated 45 slide has 851 pounds accelerating it rearward while the bullet is being accelerated forward by the same 851 pounds of force. The additional 1,074 pounds of force created in the chamber is reacted INTERNALLY.

Want a simple real world example? Lock your hands together in front of your chest and try to pull them apart as hard as you can. Let's say just for the heck of it that you're pulling with 1,925 pounds of force. However, your hands won't move since the force is acting in both directions.

Now, while still pulling with both hands locked together, have someone push on your left elbow with 851 pounds of force. You'll find that your hands move to the right.

Do the same thing but with your hands only trying to pull apart with 100 pounds of force. Have that same someone push on your left elbow again with 851 pounds of force. Your hands will move to the right at the same speed they did when they were locked together with 1,925 pounds of force.

The force locking your hands together is an INTERNAL force and has no effect on your reaction due to the 851 pounds of EXTERNAL force. Just like the drag locking the slide together in a 1911 barrel is an INTERNAL force and has a net result of ZERO regardless of whether it's 1 pound or 1,000,000 pounds. The recoil of the accelerating bullet (this is why it's called RECOIL OPERATED) pushes the slide to the rear.
 
Last edited:
OK, I'm beginning to feel a bit like 'Tuner here. ;) I think I agree with everything you say right up to the point that you imply I'm denying it. I'm not denying it. At least, I don't think I am. I think I'm saying the same things you are using different words that you do not accept because they do not conform to your way of understanding and stating the issue.

Perhaps we can agree that we agree on what is happening and agree to disagree on how best to describe it. :scrutiny:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top