If doctor/owner/receptionist seems like they may be gun-friendly;
-Ask why they felt the need to post, and if it was thrust upon them by insurance/corporate/ordinance/etc., as for specifics regarding these (and alternately for the person in charge if your contact cannot answer). Follow up the chain to determine who/what actually made the decision, and then lobby or report on that.
If doctor/owner/receptionist is likely anti-gun or ambivalent (most likely case);
-Thank them (slight retch
) for being so conscientious, and ask who the person taking such 'proactive' measures is, so you can thank them, as well. Follow the chain to determine who/what actually made the decision, then report on that.
Back to
our end of the discussion, let's try to lay out who our culprits could be;
-An office-level worker (a nurse takes it upon herself to post a cheap/free NO GUNS sign in the front window at a small concern)
-The owner made the call (for personal/political reasons)
-Corporate offices issued an edict (likely driven by someone else or an uppity management VIP)
-Local government pressure (by legal ordinance or City Council/Mayor/etc. lobbying)
-
'Charitable' foundation pressure (many hospitals have lucrative partnerships with incredibly-biased organizations that are themselves sometimes actively devoted to stamping out firearms ownership in the name of public health. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation *spit* is a good example)
-Business pressure, from Insurance, to the janitorial service, to unions, to billing companies could lobby or stipulate that guns should be restricted from the premises as a condition of doing business. Possibly, the internal accounting folks have taken it upon themselves to become insurance risk analysts, and advocate gun-free-zone signs as a potential 'cost cutting' measure
-
Legal pressure, from either internal lawsuit risk analysts, or from toothy trial lawyers baying at the front gates; both claiming that a messy shooting and messier lawsuits are 'just a matter of time' unless they put up a cardboard sign and start hassling people.
You can guess where I think the primary sources are. I fully expect no self-respecting business would divulge their reasons readily (especially if the reason comes from internal legal or accounting, making the determination proprietary classified info), but I suspect some gumshoe investigation with a friendly demeanor would narrow things down quite a bit. I recommend y'all do it yourselves, God knows your local investigative journalists will have nothing to do with it.
TCB