The Remington R51, Explained

Status
Not open for further replies.
I very much appreciate the discussion.

I have followed the R51 since the initial announcements, and I have been very disappointed with the problems that have occurred.

The proof will be in the pudding--reliability, shootability, etc.

I'll shoot one before buying.
 

Any reason the link to the thread that had pictures of ruptured cases from OOB discharges only pulls up in a text version? I'd like to see the actual thread (and pics) if anyone has the link.

Thanks.
 
If they're gonna scale it down (as if they would; it's pretty plain they intended to do a 45acp, first), I'd actually prefer it in 32acp. Being a locked action, they could increase pressure a good bit without bumping into safety or recoil issues, and you could shrink the whole platform quite a bit. Make it upward-ejecting, and I think you could get it extremely thin, as well (the slide's strength won't be as effected across the rails).

I still would like a mouse-gun using this action in 5.7x28, with a ~10 round "1.5-stack" magazine. Unfortunately, case length would likely dictate the gun couldn't get much shorter than it already is, but I strongly suspect you could get it to nearly 3/4" thin and a little shorter on the grip (three finger instead of four). The frame itself is so simple that I've actually been looking into whether or not a production gun could be adapted to the Pedersen setup with a welded-on & hardened block, and the original slide milled out for a separate breech block and bolt-on lifiting cams.

TCB
 
I think they intend to do .40S&W on this same frame/slide before scaling up to .45. Probably just need to scale up the slide. The mag well will almost accept my 1911 mags.
 
Someone with a 45 check for me, but I thought we'd determined acp would fit in the existing mags if the stamped grooves were absent --that's why my assumption. Heck, the mags are almost long enough to feed 7.62x25 (almost :()

It's funny; remember how ticked off everyone was after that idiot blogger falsely said the R51 would be the size of a Glock 380? With all the online folks saying the gun was now "huge" and et cetera? I wonder how they'd feel about a 5-6 shot 45acp (+P?) the size of a G26, but 3/16" narrower?

TCB
 
1911 mag is just a little too long (front to back) to fit the R51 mag well. .45ACP 230g hardball seems to be just a little too long to fit the R51 mag. SWC or truncated cone or deeper seated round nose would fit the mag if the spacer folds and front lip were reshaped. The R51 frame should handle .45ACP just fine. I'm just not sure about the slide and bolt.
 
Actually, come to think of it, I don't think they actually did give a year in their press release :D :D

You would think there'd be some sort of insider (or official, for Pete's sake :rolleyes:) announcement proclaiming either a delay or the triumphant start of production. Remington employees have tighter lips than the State Department, it seems. Either that, or there's no one working on the program to leak about it :evil:

It's like Willy Wonka's factory over there, or something :confused:

TCB
 
barnbwt

Oct. Wow Oct is here. Do we really dare hope?
I was just starting to warm up to this gun when everything went south.
Hope they pull it out!
 
On the Remington forum there is a post that includes a response from a "senior executive" at Remington;

"Thanks for your continued interest. No firm release date yet…still working on a couple of enhancements.

I will let you know when production resumes."

Another comment there got me to thinking. Does anyone think that the aluminum frame will hold up like the older steel frame Pedersen action handguns?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top