Hawk
Member
I find the concept of restricting "junk guns" to be profoundly unsettling.
We mostly stood aside or cheered when Bryco / Jennings / Lorcin went under but it's simply not good practice to throw someone else's baby off the sleigh.
Most of us figured that out with the '94 AWB but there were (and are) still too many that won't fidgit until their own ox is gored. Whether that ox is evil black rifles, Hi-Points and MPA or whatever, everybody's "solid citizen" firearm is somebody else's "junk".
I'd expect that to Josh Sugarman they're all junk and he'll happily work his way from Lorcin to Hi-Point to Barrett to Bushmaster to Blaser to Holland & Holland.
To some that appreciate fine English side-by-sides, your Mossberg 500 is a junk gun.
I personally find MPA's product to be trashy and their advertising to be offensive but at least I've learned a lesson: they have a right to be there so long as they're conducting themselves legally. I'll not be party to tossing them under the bus. I wish I'd figured that out earlier than I did.
We mostly stood aside or cheered when Bryco / Jennings / Lorcin went under but it's simply not good practice to throw someone else's baby off the sleigh.
Most of us figured that out with the '94 AWB but there were (and are) still too many that won't fidgit until their own ox is gored. Whether that ox is evil black rifles, Hi-Points and MPA or whatever, everybody's "solid citizen" firearm is somebody else's "junk".
I'd expect that to Josh Sugarman they're all junk and he'll happily work his way from Lorcin to Hi-Point to Barrett to Bushmaster to Blaser to Holland & Holland.
To some that appreciate fine English side-by-sides, your Mossberg 500 is a junk gun.
I personally find MPA's product to be trashy and their advertising to be offensive but at least I've learned a lesson: they have a right to be there so long as they're conducting themselves legally. I'll not be party to tossing them under the bus. I wish I'd figured that out earlier than I did.