Flynt
Member
Here's a link to one of several stories about a Mason, TX, gun dealer & CHL instructor whose radio ad has gone viral. He says he won't provide instruction to Muslims or people who voted for Obama.
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/lo...tructor-wants-no-liberals-Muslims-2241845.php
I personally don't care whether the state DPS revokes his license or not, if it was up to me, I'd leave him alone. The story did start me thinking about the issues it raises. I bet if you asked Mr. Keller he'd say he's a staunch supporter of the 2nd Amendment. I am too, which makes me wonder if it's correct to say the 2nd Amendment doesn't extend to people who don't share my religion or political views. As with the 1st Amendment, it's only truly sustained when extremely unpopular speech is protected. In other words, if you're a "purist," shouldn't everyone have the right to bear arms and let the chips fall where they may?
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/lo...tructor-wants-no-liberals-Muslims-2241845.php
I personally don't care whether the state DPS revokes his license or not, if it was up to me, I'd leave him alone. The story did start me thinking about the issues it raises. I bet if you asked Mr. Keller he'd say he's a staunch supporter of the 2nd Amendment. I am too, which makes me wonder if it's correct to say the 2nd Amendment doesn't extend to people who don't share my religion or political views. As with the 1st Amendment, it's only truly sustained when extremely unpopular speech is protected. In other words, if you're a "purist," shouldn't everyone have the right to bear arms and let the chips fall where they may?
Last edited: