The perfect rifle: The 30-30

Status
Not open for further replies.
How many of you pick up a single action and in cocking it you go C.....O.....L....T.....yup it is right.
:)
Yeah, right after I got my Colt SAA, I was showing it off to my wife. I told her, "Listen to this," and pulled the hammer back while saying, "C-O-L-T."
My wife said "So?" Then she went in the other room and came back with her Ruger Super Blackhawk. She said, "Listen to this," and pulled the hammer back. It went "click-click" as my wife said, "RU-GER.":p:D
 
Well the original poster is from Alabama so your "opinions" are invalid by your own comments.

What a completely asinine comment to leave on a discussion forum. If you don't like seeing dissenting opinions, go read a blog.

Your attempts at policing other people's discussions are unwanted and unneeded.
 
Last edited:
I can't imagine why anyone would "need" a 30-30 if they already have a 30-06
For me, if all I was going to do was hunt cervids, and I was restricted to one rifle, the .30-06 would be the ticket. But let's face it - a bolt action, full-length, scoped rifle with a five-round capacity is hardly handy for general defensive purposes post-apocalypse (except in one's sniper hide). A .30-30 with a full-length mag tube and good sights (some of us favor Skinner's) is an easy-handling, lightweight rifle capable of handling business out to a decent range. Primarily though, if one is concerned mainly about capacity, ease of handling and speed of firing, the lever-gun has the advantage. When we have to give up our semi-auto rifles (which, the way things are going, is seeming almost inevitable), what're you gonna use around the ranch and home? Firepower vs. accuracy. Firing faster vs. reach out and touch something.

Boy, I'd hate to have to give up my Model 70s, though...
 
What a completely asinine comment to leave on a discussion forum. If you don't like seeing dissenting opinions, go read a blog.

Your attempts at policing other people's discussions are unwanted and unneeded.

No it's not and I'm not trying to police anything. If anything your comment was asinine. You said.

The part of the country where a 30-30 is "perfect" ends west of the Mississippi and somewhere North of west Virginia.
Outside that you are hamstringing yourself with a 30-30.

The OP lives in Alabama so your comments about your part of the country are invalid. You must be from California,
 
I shot a lever action 30-30 with factory hunting ammo and found it to be quite the hard kicker. Lightish gun with heavyish bullets in a full power load. I know that's not considered stout, for a rifle, but it's too much for me if I'm not moose hunting. (and I don't hunt moose)

Having no attachment to 30-30, I think I'd rather choose a .243 Win bolt action. Maybe a 6.5 Creed

...or if I wanted a brush gun for ≤ 100 yards, my Marlin 1894 in 44 Mag. (~ 1800 fps w/240 gr JSP) Shares ammo with my favorite long-range revolver, the 7.5" Redhawk.
 
I shot a lever action 30-30 with factory hunting ammo and found it to be quite the hard kicker. Lightish gun with heavyish bullets in a full power load. I know that's not considered stout, for a rifle, but it's too much for me if I'm not moose hunting. (and I don't hunt moose)

Having no attachment to 30-30, I think I'd rather choose a .243 Win bolt action. Maybe a 6.5 Creed

...or if I wanted a brush gun for ≤ 100 yards, my Marlin 1894 in 44 Mag. (~ 1800 fps w/240 gr JSP) Shares ammo with my favorite long-range revolver, the 7.5" Redhawk.

If you don't snug it up to your shoulder it's going to kick. If you do snug it up it's more of a push.
 
No it's not and I'm not trying to police anything. If anything your comment was asinine. You said.



The OP lives in Alabama so your comments about your part of the country are invalid. You must be from California,

I don't particularly care about your opinion regarding my opinion. Don't like it? Don't read it.

Feel free to put me on ignore I'd you like.
 
Last edited:
For me, if all I was going to do was hunt cervids, and I was restricted to one rifle, the .30-06 would be the ticket. But let's face it - a bolt action, full-length, scoped rifle with a five-round capacity is hardly handy for general defensive purposes post-apocalypse (except in one's sniper hide). A .30-30 with a full-length mag tube and good sights (some of us favor Skinner's) is an easy-handling, lightweight rifle capable of handling business out to a decent range. Primarily though, if one is concerned mainly about capacity, ease of handling and speed of firing, the lever-gun has the advantage.
IMO, that's a very good point too, Old Dog. And it's the reason I keep my Model 94, 30-30 loaded, and in the top of a closet. Before I got my beloved 308 Norma Mag, I used a Model 77 Ruger 30-06 for all of my big game hunting. And while I appreciate the versatility of both rifles (for the type of big game hunting I do, and in the kind of country I do it in) neither my 30-06, nor my 308 Norma would be all that great for home defense. Of course, my "go to" gun for home defense is a 1911 .45 ACP, but it's nice to know there's a handy Model 94 in the top of a closet if I need it. :thumbup:
 
When I was a resident Pennsylvania I participated in Sight In Days at a Sportsmen's Club. We saw a lot of rifles in 30-30 predominantly utilized by all ages of shooters. The truth is there are a substantial numbers of hunters young-middle-aged and old, that their marksmanship is questionable under the best conditions.
 
I shot a lever action 30-30 with factory hunting ammo and found it to be quite the hard kicker.
It has been discussed many, many times here on THR, but I'm going to say it again: how hard a gun "kicks" has a lot to do with perception. My own dad was the most recoil-shy person I've ever known, and he too thought, "30-30s kicked too _______ hard for what they're worth!" - his words exactly.
The fact is, my 5'2" 120lb wife was talking about Dad's aversion to 30-30 recoil just the other night. Dad had her convinced a Model 94, 30-30 was at least going to turn her shoulder black and blue, if not break it. Now that my wife has been around guns and shooting for 50+, she laughs about Dad believing "30-30s kicked too _______ hard for what they're worth!"
My wife uses a semi-custom Model 70, 7mm Rem Mag for big game hunting nowadays. She doesn't think it kicks much at all. Yet I DO! But here's the thing about that - my wife's 7mm Rem Mag fits her perfectly because she had it built that way. I'm 5'10" and 200 lbs - it doesn't fit me worth a darn. ;)
 
I started shooting so called hard kicking guns when I was 11 with my dads model 12 Winchester 12 gauge and no recoil pad. I got my first shotgun right after that, an 1887 Winchester 12 gauge with a steel butt plate . I got a 1903 A3 30-06 with a steel butt plate when I was 12. I shot the snot out of those guns. They weren't what I would call hard kickers even then. None of my guns have recoil pads now and I'm 65. I did have a Weatherby .257 WM that had one but it came on the gun and would have made the length of pull too short if I took it off. I also had one in 30-378 that had one. It did have a brake so I think the pad was overkill. I'm not saying people don't feel recoil more than others but I think the way you hold a gun has a lot to do with it. If you hold a 30-06 like a bb gun its going to stomp a mudhole in your butt. I also agree that having a gun that fits you helps with recoil. When my stepdaughter was 14 she had no problem shooting one of my 12 gauge SXS's but my 20 gauge SXS kicked too hard.
 
When I was a resident Pennsylvania I participated in Sight In Days at a Sportsmen's Club. We saw a lot of rifles in 30-30 predominantly utilized by all ages of shooters. The truth is there are a substantial numbers of hunters young-middle-aged and old, that their marksmanship is questionable under the best conditions.
And I'm sure that's always been the main reason for a lot of the negative feelings toward the 30-30, Shot Placement! Sure it does not do the shock and trauma damage that say a 30-06 does! But with correct shot Placement from a decent bullet within the ranges of that bullets necessary velocity, the 30-30 will kill every time, just as dead as any other cartridge. Larger more powerful cartridges turn marginal hits into kling shots! I've seen too many times myself, that a good loads and bullet in a 30-30 will drop any deer within sight and often in his tracks! No, it's not a great western cartridge as a general rule! Most eastern woods and especially where I hunt, it's a great cartridge!
That being said, I'm as big a fan of the 30-30 as anyone I know! But if I had to settle for one, my 30-06 would win, but barely! But I have setup for hunting here in big woods-shorter ranges. A3-9×40 mounted with Warne QD Mounts and Rings. I can remove the scope and be just as effective out to 100yds with my Tikka M65 iron sights. And it shoots the Rem 180 CL just as accurate as the 150g standard load I'll usually use! I love the 30-06, it is IMO, the most versatile cartridge there is for N.America! I'd gladly settle on only a 30-30, 308, 30-06, and 300Win Mag knowing icould hunt the world!
 
Know your game and your own capabilities but EVERYONE needs a 30-30!!!
No, it's not a great western cartridge as a general rule! Most eastern woods and especially where I hunt, it's a great cartridge!
The statement in the OP's first post in this thread, "...EVERYONE needs a 30-30!!!" is the reason I posted in this thread at all. As you said, M65Man, the 30-30 is "not a great western cartridge as a general rule." I live and hunt in the west, and I DON'T "need" a 30-30 for the places I hunt big game. As a matter of fact, if I only hunted with a 30-30, I'd be lessening my chances of even getting a mule deer in Idaho - where the chances of getting mule deer are less than 1 in 3 already!
That's not to say I think 30-30s won't kill mule deer. I've cleanly taken 2 mule deer with my 30-30. But that was back in the '80s when mule deer were plentiful around here, we were allowed 2 or them per season (as long as one was antlerless), and I'd already killed one earlier those years with my 30-06, or my 338 Win Mag.
I love the 30-06, it is IMO, the most versatile cartridge there is for N.America! I'd gladly settle on only a 30-30, 308, 30-06, and 300Win Mag knowing icould hunt the world!
A handloader (which I very much am) can make a 300 Win Mag (or a 308 Norma Mag;)) shoot just like a 30-06, OR a 308 Win, OR a 30-30. :thumbup:
 
Last edited:
The statement in the OP's first post in this thread, "...EVERYONE needs a 30-30!!!" is the reason I posted in this thread at all. As you said, M65Man, the 30-30 is "not a great western cartridge as a general rule." I live and hunt in the west, and I DON'T "need" a 30-30 for the places I hunt big game. As a matter of fact, if I only hunted with a 30-30, I'd be lessening my chances of getting a mule deer at all in Idaho - where the chances of getting mule deer are less than 1 in 3 already!
That's not to say I think 30-30s won't kill mule deer. I've cleanly taken 2 mule deer with my 30-30. But that was back in the '80s when mule deer were plentiful around here, we were allowed 2 or them per season (as long as one was antlerless), and I'd already killed one earlier those years with my 30-06, or my 338 Win Mag.

A handloader (which I very much am) can make a 300 Win Mag (or a 308 Norma Mag;)) shoot just like a 30-06, OR a 308 Win, OR a 30-30. :thumbup:
Absolutely, I already have som 30-30/06 loads for my Tikka. A regular 150g Sierra PH FN (a 30-30 bullet) at, I forget exactly, aprox 2550-2600fps, and it's as accurate as if shot from a 30-30, maybe better! It's amazing what a reloader can do with just .308 bullets! My regular hunting load in my 06, is just a standard 308 load by ballistics, a 150g @2,850fps. I've shot plenty 3/4"groups and sub, @100 yds, and 2.5" at 250yds, it's all I need! If I didn't have the 06, I'd be just as happy with a 308!
 
I miss my H&R single shot 30-30. I had the barrel cut down to 16" and trimmed the stock a bit so it fit me like the perfect shotgun. Open sights--it was a deer slayer. I had a shot off and a second round chambered (just in case, heh, heh) before my hunting buddies could even find the mulie in their sissy scopes. Unfortunately, this made me the guy that had to go down into the sage-filled draws where all the ticks were.

I bought a Model 94 once but dang, racking that lever hurt my fingers. Love the look of them, but wouldn't buy another one.
 
It's pretty easy to see that the "love" of the .30-30 is a largely emotional reaction. My only objection to all that emotional hype is that it is not even close to "perfect" for everyone. You want to adore it, feel free. For me there is no aspect of the round (and the traditional rifle for it) that cannot be bettered by other cartridges and rifles. The fact that so many get so upset with any comments other than adoration, proves that the fandom is more emotional, nostalgic, and romantic than ballistic or practical. Some people like kale. Doesn't make kale the perfect vegetable.
 
Eh - I wouldn't say "impressive".
It's a .30-30 thread.

Thread drift happens. It's to be expected.
Can even add to the conversation sometimes.
Doesn't mean it's on topic...


[EDIT: I think the "perfect" statement was tongue in cheek and meant to get a rise out of some. Worked like a charm. That's where the "emotion" is that I'm seeing.]
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top