haiauphixu
Member
Mine was sent to Remington last June, and that was a big mistake, I never heard a thing about it since. Anyone ever get their replacement?
moosie said:I would think some threats from some attorney might get things rolling
..............that although the originals are still running fine (and sought after by collectors), some designs don't tradition well into big corporate MIM and robotics.barnbwt
Where have all the R51s gone,
Long time passing,
When will they ever learn,
When will they ever learn.
some designs don't tradition well into big corporate MIM and robotics.
People who like the idea/design of the gun and bought one in 2014 will "care" as it amounted to an investment of money. The gun had promise; it was very well designed ergonomically even though the interior needed work.I fail to understand why anyone really cares?
It could be a very viable pistol if Remington gets it right the 2nd time around. Atleast for me, if they manage to turn out a nice gun, no short chambers, nicer interior that doesn't look like Fred Flintstone chipped it out with a stone axe, I will consider it quit viable -- atleast for me.Like it is even a viable pistol after such a debacle.
Not if it was a Windows OS driving.They forgot to ream chambers on some of them. I don't think you can blame that on robots.
I suppose you could argue about possible commercial success .... I think Remington could make it work but they CANNOT muck it this go-round -- or it WILL BE A FAILURE.
You literally just described EVERY Remington product introduction of the last 30 years.
Why would you even suspect this one would be different