Nichels747 -- while I agree with much of your post, it still just strikes me as on the extreme edge of acceptable action by the police officers involved. Certainly an LEO has no oblibation to allow themselves to be injured or killed -- from the information in the articles so far, I really don't see WHY the officers thought themselves in mortal danger, thus tripping the use of deadly force.
They might have a very good reason, but I just don't see it yet.
Maybe more information will be forthcoming from the officer's -- but I doubt it. I suspect that they have lawyers now that will forbid them to speak of his incident, in anticipation of the civil lawsuits surely to follow.
They might have a very good reason, but I just don't see it yet.
Maybe more information will be forthcoming from the officer's -- but I doubt it. I suspect that they have lawyers now that will forbid them to speak of his incident, in anticipation of the civil lawsuits surely to follow.