cheap gun bashing

Status
Not open for further replies.
A rather economically poor hillbilly neighbor of mine somehow acquired a Hi Point pistol in .45 ACP. As proud as a Peacock he brought it by to show me. “shoot it” he said, which I did. Surprisingly good shooter. I went in the house and brought out my 100 year old 1911. “Shoot it” I said, which he did. As he lowered the 1911 he said “wow! Do you want to trade?
No I replied. The difference in feel between the two is quite pronounced.
 
Oddly enough, my HiPoint c9 has been just about the most reliable semiauto I have owned. I think it works because the entire gun is designed around it’s lower end metal, has few parts, and is a very simple design. When manufacturers try to copy, for example, a Glock and use poor quality materials that’s when you’re asking for problems.
 
I have owned several Hi-Points in my life. Everyone of them worked when called upon. My only gripe with them is they are heavy, butt ugly, and are aggravating to take down. I do not have one right now but would get one for a truck gun, it’ll work and if it is stolen, not out a lot of money.
 
They have their place, for sure.

For some folks, home defense is important but spending $500 on a glock isn't in the cards. Hi points seem to shoot when they need to and are mostly guilty of just being an ugly cuss of a gun. The person buying one is not looking for match performance. She's probably only hoping it'll empty its magazine into her abusive ex boyfriend if he kicks in the door.

I dont mind cost effective guns. My pocket knife in my right pocket costs more than the pistol in my left pocket. For me, I feel just fine with an LCP II day to day. For some, that's a cheap gun they wouldn't consider getting their life on. For others, they may scratch their head and wonder why I didnt get the $110 Hipoint for $120 less. Most are wondering why i carry a $280 pocketknife when a Swiss Army Knife would probably do the same thing:neener:
 
For me it still really boils down to respect for our fellow man, freedom and our constitution. The context in which this thread was started, was due to several things that have been bothering me for a while. The internet is full of trolls and people who make comments with little thought or respect for others. There comes a point where you see enough of it, and you have to say something. Problem with the internet is making a common sense reply to such a comment inevitably results in a flame war aka complete waste of your time :)

I look at it this way, if there was no need for cheap guns, they wouldn't be made. Sure, we can share experiences but at the end of the day, a person purchasing a cheap gun , they are making that decision. That is thanks to our laws and rights. We should always work together to preserve that.
 
I hate the word 'cheap'. I owned a 995 and it worked great right out of the box. My only expense was a couple extra magazines and a sling.
Inexpensive yes, but cheap, no.
 
I am a cheapskate. Just ask my wife.

I haunt Gunbroker looking for bargains. I have gotten a lot of good service pistols (usually police turn-ins or milsurp) for less than $300. Quite a few were closer to $200. My best deal so far was a Beretta 96 for a winning bid of around $150... or maybe it was closer to $200 and it was the Ruger P90 that was $150...

Anyway, you get the idea. You CAN get a good-quality gun for cheap if you are knowledgeable and patient. The "you get what you pay for" people have obviously never shot my Beretta.

As for Hi-Points, all I've ever owned is one of their 9mm carbines. I still own it. I got it a year or two ago, used, for $120 or something ridiculous like that. It goes bang every time and is as accurate as the peep sights allow. It's butt ugly. So is my rescue doggy, but I still love her. :)

I am not interested in the "pot metal" pistols, but I am not going to immediately start bashing a firearm just because it is/was inexpensive.
 
I hate the word 'cheap'. I owned a 995 and it worked great right out of the box. My only expense was a couple extra magazines and a sling.
Inexpensive yes, but cheap, no.

I have their 45 acp carbine, and it works fine. It's not something I use frequently, it was just one of those impulse buys, and used ammo I already had on hand for my glock 21sf, so I figured why not?
 
I've got quite an array of different firearms, everything from a Davis derringer, to a Sig Sauer, 1911 two tone ultra compact, not to mention my Colt 70 Series Gold Cup National Match, and my 3rd generation Colt Peacemakers, as far as carbines go I'll gladly admit that I've got a Hi Point 9mm carbine that I've put at least a 1000 rounds thru, and God only knows how many my sons have put thru it, as about the only time I get my hands on it is to replace the batteries, when the reflex sight stops working. BTW I also own several Browning high dollar shotguns, Weatherby rifles, and a M-1 Carbine. I've seen some Hi Point hand guns that just didn't interest me due mostly to there size, but I'd be the last one to downgrade someone because of his choice of a firearm, to each his own whatever that may be.
 
This isnt just relegated to “cheap” handguns.

There are some just plain awful shotguns out there too.

I still won’t bash many of them. Cept the Winchester 1911SL. No love for that 12 gauge death trap.
 
Anyway, you get the idea. You CAN get a good-quality gun for cheap if you are knowledgeable and patient. The "you get what you pay for" people have obviously never shot my Beretta.

This is of course, true. I refer to getting a deal if you are patient.

Still the "you get what you pay for" people are correct because someone paid the asking price for your Baretta when it was new. The quality of said item is not changed if you personally bought it used for $50.00 or if someone who doesn't know what he is doing paid $2,000 for the same gun you purchased. The used market price can be influenced by factors that have nothing to do with the quality or lack of.
 
The people that can only afford the cheap guns are the ones most likely to need them.


Not necessarily.

A few years ago, I had a neighbor that bought a Taurus 9MM.

For the next year, all I heard from him was how badly he had been ripped off, and what a POS that gun was.

When I told him that if you buy the cheapest gun on the rack, you will GET the cheapest gun on the rack, he whined that he couldn't afford anything better.

Now, this individual had more money invested in his "show" Harley than I have in my stock portfolio. He drove a new "Suburban" and his wife drove a Corvette.

Yet he couldn't "afford" a S&W, SIG, Beretta, etc.

I think a large percentage of cheap guns are sold to folks like him.
 
Never shot a HI point but the videos I watched they seem to shoot OK. Got a lot of crap for buying a Taurus G2 but it's had well over 1000 round and not an issues with it(except when I don't fully seat primers)

I have never shot one (Hi Point) either.

Funny about the Taurus. I have a PT140 MIL-PRO which is a 40 S&W. I bought this in 2004 never really shot it though. It was subject to a recall for a refund or owners could keep it and get a lifetime warranty. Because I have 3 or 4 extra magazines and two good carry holsters I decided to keep it because I would only get about $200 for it.

Anyway, the last time I shot it was about 6 years ago and did terrible with it. I have plans to polish the innards to see if I can get the trigger to smooth out but I think that now since I have a few years of DA revolver experience I'm thinking the problem might have to do with the long hard trigger. I think I paid about $230.00 for it NIB (might have been more I forget) but that was almost 15 years ago. I guess this would qualify as a cheap gun and if anyone wants to bash it go ahead. I'm going to give it another try, the guns is nice shape/weight for carry but unless you can hit a target it's not a good carry gun obviously.

Regardless, the gun has it's limitations even on a good day and if were not for the fact I had money tied up in aftermarket stuff I would have taken Taurus up on the offer for a refund. I would have been better served spending a little more for a better gun.
 
I have plans to polish the innards to see if I can get the trigger to smooth out but I think that now since I have a few years of DA revolver experience I'm thinking the problem might have to do with the long hard trigger.

I did this with my Makarov. I detail stripped it and polished all mating parts, other than the sear. When I was done it was, and is, a very good feeling pistol. The pull is still heavy, but it is a lot smoother.
 
I used to work at Gunstore in Phx AZ for a bit in '97, in '98 and '99. One day the manager overheard me and another salesmen give our opinion of the Hi-Point to a customer when asked. From me that opinion consisted of "It's a piece of junk, you'd be better off going across the street to Home Depot and buying a brick. At least that might work if you have to throw it at someone".

I mentally lumped in Hi Point with Loricin, Bryco, Jennings and other cheap pistols that I'd actually shot and in a couple cases .. owned. Trading guns around that cost a couple twenties used. I'd shot all those other ones (when they worked). So I naturally assumed that the Hi Points were exactly the same.

Apparently the manager didn't like that opinion all that much. When confronted about it neither of us backed down, we weren't going to lie and sell people junk guns when their lives might depend on those guns. The next morning st the morning meeting he asked all the employees what their opinion of the Hi-Point was. To a man everyone stated that they thought that it was a total piece of crap.

The manager organized a shoot where all the sales staff took a Hi Point 9mil that we'd taken in trade out shooting. We used the bullets that we kept in back where shoplifters had stolen a handful of ammo and put it in their pocket. We regularly filled up the boxes that we found when we checked everything out in the morning.

They'd been talking about doing an employee day, so that was the subject matter for the day.

Each of us took turns shooting it. No malfunctions the entire time from anyone. The whole thing was top heavy. The trigger was horrible, the reset long. I had to take my finger completely off the trigger in order to get it to reset and there was no audible or tactile 'click' when it reset, but it did in fact work.

So our collective opinion became 'junk that actually works'.

We did actually stock Loricins, Jennings, Bryco's, Davis and other cheap Ring of Fire pistols in the store. Not many, but we carried them. When we sold them it wasn't because any of the sales staff was pushing them except for one assistant manager who was bucking for manager who was without any scruples whatsoever. Most of us just steered customers away from those towards something else that worked, police trade in S&W 38's and .357's, various Hungarian FEG models, Makarov's, Ruger 95's and S&W Sigma's (when they were on sale) and occasionally after that shoot even Hi-Points.

The Jennings, Davis, Loricin, Bryco and Phoenix pistols weren't so much dangerous to the shooter (unless the owner was involved in a violent confrontation and he/she suddenly had an inoperable pistol) as they would just quit suddenly working because some small part broke rendering the pistol inoperable. Or they just were never really anything but a single shot pistol to begin with. We never had a Ring of Fire pistol blow up on a customer, but we sent a fair number back.

Hi Point is a bit different than those. I turned out to be wrong in that case. I never gave an opinion on a gun that I hadn't shot either.

After shooting one I still continued to steer customers towards the used pistol counter (I.E. P85 and 89, S&W Sigma) towards the former Com-Bloc pistols (I.E. FEG and Makarov's) and the Military Surplus pistols (CZ-52's, Tokarevs, CZ-27's and French Walther P-38's) if they were strapped for cash and didn't really know what they wanted. However if their budget meant that they were going to end up getting a Ring of Fire pistol I'd always pull the Hi Points out first.
 
Last edited:
People that haven’t owned Hi Points love to bash them when we start talking about cheap guns.

But when the topic of a cheap red-dot comes up, the Bushnell TRS-25 will get resounding praises.

What’s the difference? Appearance. Hi Points look ugly so people bash them. TRS-25’s don’t look ugly, so they are recommended. But functionally both are darned good options when you can’t or don’t want to spend much. I have two of both that have been flawless. Yet I've had a Ruger revolver lock up on me once and a Glock 23 that had repeated FTE issues.
 
The phrase "live within your means" still holds true. If I could only afford a hi-point, I would own a hi-point. I have owned a hi-point before, as our first semi auto center fire pistol. Shot anything I put through it, and with its heavy slide, would make a great club.

Obviously it's not a great shooting gun. Its poorly balanced and clunky acting. But it goes bang and I'd trust it if I had no other choice.

Bought for 150, sold for 150.

I've also got two Taurus pt 22s and a Taurus pump action 22 rifle that go bang every time too. My interarms revolvers (.44mag and spec) shoot great, and I have zero qualms about them.
 
P series Rugers are not JUNK....Just LARGE...HA. HA. HA...Bill.
Yeah, like holding onto a 2X4.

There is a difference between cheap and inexpensive guns. Io's, Pheonix, and Ravens come to mind as cheap. I bought a couple of IO Inc's 380's when everyone was jumping on the smaller carry guns. After breaking one down and inspecting it I was ashamed to sell them. Inexpensive guns can be well made. My Ruger Security Nine was reasonable priced and shoots as good as my Glock. I had a LCP, LC9, LC380 and a couple of Keltecs that cost me around $200 that served me well and were well made. If a person carries and shoots a few rounds, a low cost handgun can serve them well. If they want to put a zillion rounds through them they are better off coughing up some change.
 
Bashing is, indeed human nature. Just check out the Blackpowder forum thread on Loyalist Arms guns. Same opinions, different guns.

As a gun show promoter for the last 30 years I have heard a lot of strongly held opinions on guns. Unless you have actual experience in the subject I will generally smile and ignore you.

Sometimes a bad reputation will hang on even if it is no longer warranted. I started teaching CPL classes about the time that Hi Point began producing their first 380 pistols. To save money we bought a dozen of them for our students to use.

With in 5 years we had sent all of them back for repair. They all split at the mould line on the back of the grips. Based solely on that experience I could have declared all Hi Points are junk, but I did not because the company fixed the problem.

I had a similar experience with a first generation Scyy pistol.

Sometimes reputation is more repetition than reality.

IronHand
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top