KY WalMart O/C Trespass Incident - More to the Story

ATLDave said:

I do respect your right to do whatever is legal.

That includes Open Carry, burning crosses in your front yard, and wearing obscene tshirts in public.

Click to expand...

Whew! The playground is getting rough when someone disagrees with you two.

ATLDave you are attempting to link me with being a Nazi.

edwardware you are trying to link me with being a KKK by your crossburning comment.

I do agree with one thing. We have nothing further to talk about.

I'm happy to report that folks are still OC in the Richmond/Tri Cities areas.

Including Walmart.


I've yet to see anyone on the news, YT or getting trespassed/cops called on them. And no one batts an eye.

I must live in a guntopian bubble....

BSA1 said:

Whew! The playground is getting rough when someone disagrees with you two.

ATLDave you are attempting to link me with being a Nazi.

Click to expand...

I was explicit in NOT doing that. Please actually read what I post. Or don’t, what do I care?

OC is a bit like women who persist on going topless in public. In some cities it's legal and I have absolutely no objection to it personally. Some people do have objections to it however and will do what they can to stop it. How long do you think Walmart would let a women shop in their store topless? They would immediately be ask to leave even tho walking down a public street in that city topless may be entirely legal.

There are some women who will go topless in public to assert their right to be topless in public. I'm sure it's the same mindset that people who OC have. It's a great way to get attention but that's about the extent of it.

Walk around in public topless or OC, I have no objection to either one, but I have to wonder why someone would do it.

BSA1 said:

Whew! The playground is getting rough when someone disagrees with you two.
. . .
edwardware you are trying to link me with being a KKK by your crossburning comment.

Click to expand...

Nope. As @ATLDave said, don't read what's not there. I needed an example of legal, but unhelpful, behaviour to counter your argument that the legality of the behaviour should be our only consideration.

Legality is one of several considerations, not the only consideration. Now I have illustrated the point.

This has become unacceptable to THR. Some of you are becoming close to having to find a new forum.

Closed