All the people complaining about the looks of this pistol obviously have been looking at their Glocks too long.
Hey, guess what? It's OK for a firearm to look like something other than a brick.
The same goes for 1911's, all you people who can't see beauty in anything but slab sides
. Love the 'shops, Ash, very funny
. Throw up the disc-gun with G## on the side for good measure
. Just curious, whether they liked it or not, were people
ever compelled to play with the image of the Glock, SIG, CZ, or any recent 1911 they way we are now? Methinks the detractors don't quite realize how much they themselves actually like the design, but can't quite square (pun) that realization with the boxy guns they are invested in
. A slab-sided R51 would look like a Caracal with a polished slide, guys, and we all know how many people said
those were ugly
The gun is a sort of new Art-Deco (very roughly sort of). Mostly in that it is obvious that some artists/marketeers/human factor guys were involved in shaping the external appearance of the gun. It is always a good thing when more disciplines have a chance to influence a design; it keeps guns from having boxy grips, ugly finishes, and square slides. I'm very impressed that Remington came up with a design that is neither tacticool nor Fudd-erly, but will still appeal to both sexes in a major way.
When I heard a Feb. release date, I wondered if this was reasonable, especially considering I've been waiting for Beretta to finally release the 223 ARX for like a year after they said they would ship "in the next 60 days" or whatever. But the pro-activeness of Remington's engagement with the aftermarket suggests the time is now; all the vendors making holsters and grips (and probably sights by now) stand to lose a lot of money on their inventory if Remington delays the project for a year out of the blue.
Unless this gun has a serious flaw out of the gate, like if the safety doesn't work, or if there's some really bad press like 5 people having negligent discharges within the first week, I think Remington has a winning pistol for the near future. Hopefully the Pedersen Action gets some more attention and spreads to some other platforms.
The man was an absolute genius; the Remington 51 was nearly adopted by the military and cost during war-time was the best reason they found to refuse it, and the rifle/cartridge he developed led both the Garand and Johnson (and 30-06 ball) for a spell before the military changed its mind --again, based mostly on cost and preference (for a rotating bolt). He worked with Browning to create the progenitor to the Ithaca M37 shotgun, and developed the sub-caliber device which could transform a bolt-gun into a sub-machine gun. While Browning was famous for ground-breaking designs which were expensive to produce but very well made, there is a definite tendency in Pedersen's works towards simplicity and producibility (the pistol only lost because it was expensive/complex compared to simple blowbacks)
TCB