(CA) Bill Requires Ammunition Tagging

Status
Not open for further replies.

sm

member
Joined
Dec 22, 2002
Messages
28,387
Location
Between black coffee, and shiftn' gears
California Bill Requires Ammunition Tagging

http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/InTheNews.aspx?ID=7543

California could become the first state in the nation to require semi-automatic handguns include microscopic equipment for pressing an identifying mark into every bullet fired.

Read About It: The Tribune

--

The Tribune
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/mld/sanluisobispo/news/nation/14451081.htm

California bill seeks to require guns to tag ammunition

BY REBECCA ROSEN LUM
Knight Ridder Newspapers

WALNUT CREEK, Calif. - California could become the first state in the nation to require semi-automatic handguns include microscopic equipment for pressing an identifying mark into every bullet fired.

Through newly developed technology, the firing pin of a semi-automatic weapon can stamp the gun's make and model onto a bullet shell as it leaves the chamber. The technology could help police investigate homicides and trace gun trafficking.

Thirty-three California police chiefs support a bill, sponsored by Assemblyman Paul Koretz, a West Hollywood Democrat, that would require the markers.

"It has the potential to solve some significant crimes in some pretty large numbers," Koretz said in a telephone interview.

Officers could quickly match the casing numbers to weapons on a state gun sales database maintained by the California Department of Justice.

It's the second go-round for the bill, which passed the Assembly easily last year but was defeated in the Senate. This year, the votes are there, Koretz said.

Nearly 1,800 Californians lost their lives to gun violence in 2004, according to the state Department of Justice. But police make arrests in only 55 percent of homicides due to the lack of sufficient evidence.

Sam Paredes, director of the 30,000-member California Gun Owners Association, said proponents of the bill are engaging in "a lot of wishful thinking" if they believe mandating the technology will turn that around.

"All it takes is a few swipes (on the pin) with a sandpaper or nail file, and (the marker) is gone," he said.

He called the technology "laughable," saying trigger-happy criminals could outwit police investigators by picking up spent shells at a shooting range and sprinkling them at a crime scene.

That drew a big laugh from Todd Lizotte, who developed the technology for use in laser printers while he was vice president of NanoVia, a semiconductor and microelectronic equipment manufacturer bought by Hitachi in 2003.

There's nothing stopping perpetrators of gun violence from doing that now, he said.

"The truth is, nobody ever does that," he said. "When people talk about these issues, they tend to raise the common criminal up to the level of criminal mastermind and the police down to the level of (cartoon character) Wile E. Coyote."

The pin is nearly as hard as a diamond, he said. In addition, the markers on the pin are invisible to the naked eye.

The technology expands on the incidental markings that already appear on cartridge casings, Lizotte said. "Instead of relying on randomly created marks, we're placing an identifier specific to that firearm."

Hitachi acquired NanoVia, but not its ballistic imaging component. That went to ID Dynamics, a holding company founded by Lizotte and his partners.

An Assembly revote is being held up while Koretz and Assemblyman Jay La Suer, a San Diego Republican and the bill's chief critic, agree on a date for a demonstration.

"I told him if they're able to file (the pin) down, I'll halt the bill," Koretz said. "My understanding of the technology is that it's pretty foolproof."

The bill has the support of state Attorney General Bill Lockyer and police chiefs from Los Angeles. Also supporting the bill are police chiefs from four cities in Alameda County and six cities in Contra Costa County. The Alameda County Sheriff also supports the bill.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger does not comment on pending bills, a spokeswoman said.

Parendes of the Gun Owners Association said the bill "doesn't stand the chance of a snowball in the deep, dark center of the earth."

Meanwhile, a growing number of cities and counties are voting on resolutions supporting the bill. One in Contra Costa County, sponsored by Supervisors John Gioia of Richmond and Mark DeSaulnier of Concord, squeaked by in a 3-2 vote April 11.

Supervisor Gayle Uilkema of Lafayette said the bill amounts to an unfunded state mandate with counties left to pick up the costs. But the bill's supporters say there are no costs to local government.

Outfitting new guns will cost the manufacturers 25 cents to 50 cents per firearm, Lizotte said. More than 70 percent of new handguns sold in California are semi-automatic.

"I question people who opposed something so straightforward," said Griffin Dix, California state council president of the Million Mom March. "You can put an identifying number on every container of yogurt you sell, but not on a gun?"

---

My comment : I tease, rib and all with folks in CA, mostly off public forum. In return I get ribbed for having a southern drawl and such.

This thread will be civil will it not?

We have to stand united on RKBA, even in efforts in other jurisdictions, or other states.

CA - Allow me to be so forward to remind you of just two CA THR members who gave of themselves to assist others - and not neccessarily in CA local jurisdiction or in CA.

1) Skunk was in NOLA doing volunteer work.

2) Jim March actually was charged with a felony in fighting for how voting was done , and results tallied. [Jim is okay, charges dropped :) ] Same /similar software, is used around the US.

Just two of many CA members, who have assited a LOT of folks in other areas.
My suggestion instead of wasting Oleg's bandwith by posting a bash, or uncivil reply...
Use the computer and Internet to find out how you can help the folks in CA.
Too many members not in CA already appreciate asssistance from CA folks.

Hedging off similar legislation now in CA, may mean you will not need assistance when legislation like this introduced in YOUR area.

Steve
 
It's not about 'solving crime'. It's purpose is to make the threshhold for handgun sales in CA impossibly high in order to discourage manufacturers from selling here, that's all. It's unlawful restraint of trade and should be so challenged and overturned IMO.
 
The guy who "laughed" about it is a dishonest guy trying to make a buck. He's selling patent medicine.

Criminals don't pick up shells at ranges now because there's no reason to. If it could help them evade the law, they will make the minor effort. This doesn't require a "criminal mastermind."

And if 45% of homicides result in no arrests -- not convictions, ARRESTS -- then Wile E Coyote is an appropriate metaphor for law enforcement, no? Wile E isn't stupid; he's just often defeated by the Roadrunner.

Think about that... in 800 of the 1800 murders, NO ONE WAS EVEN ARRESTED!

This technology could change that. Someone will be arrested. Chances are, it will be someone other than the murderer. Only a few criminals use their own license plates for a getaway car. This will just make stealing a gun even more profitable for thieves.
 
This comes up over and over. It is so stupid that it's hard for me to imagine it will ever pass, but then again, this is California so who knows.

The answer to all gun control problems we have can be found in my sig.
 
So what next? Are they going to ban revolvers, which DON'T DROP THEIR BRASS? :confused:

And what happens when someone picks up microstamped brass from Joe Law-Abider at the range, sells it to gangbangers who then toss it out at a crime scene?

Joe Law-Abider gets arrested because it was "his" brass at the crime?

"The truth is, nobody ever does that," he said. "When people talk about these issues, they tend to raise the common criminal up to the level of criminal mastermind and the police down to the level of (cartoon character) Wile E. Coyote."

Yeah, hah hah..ever seen how LARGE the cold-case file room at most police headquarters is? Or how many crime scenes are ruined because someone moved stuff around or missed something really obvious? All criminals are not stupid, and all investigators are not geniuses.
 
Look-

The way they want to implement this is that all new pistols sold need to have the stamp.

I, as a citizen with a squeaky-clean record, a strong sense of morality, and a hunting license at that, would immediately have the pin replaced and the original destroyed.

Why? To prevent exactly the scenario described. I reload shotshells; I find the prospect of picking up 9mm practice brass and reloading it to be not worth my time and effort. Revolver shells, maybe, since I can just drop them back in the box, but not scattered 9mm at $5.75 a box of 50. My semiauto brass ends up in the recycle bucket at the range. So I don't want my serial number on it, just like I don't leave my SS card, license, ATM card and PIN number lying around for people to use criminally.
 
Maybe what they should do is crack down on the bad guys rather than impose more STUPID laws that will only impact the law abiding citizens. Do thay really think in their small minds that this will cut down on crime?? As some of you've said this is just another way to make it more difficult and costly to purchase guns and ammo in that radical state... I can only hope Schwarzenegger has at least one muscle working (brain) and throws it out..

Good luck to you all who live in Ca..


C
 
Break a firing pin? Go to jail if you replace it.

Last I heard, removing a s/n from a gun is a crime... so if you replace a broken firing pin, it best have the s/n on it....
 
It's to "indirectly" cut down crime through reducing gun ownership from adding onerous ownership requirements.

Take it personally; but don't try to ascribe any sense to it. The people pushing this know it's stupid; but that enough people will believe it works for it to be okay.
 
Anyone else get the feeling we're watching a tennis match between the two coasts on who can out stupid the other?- The ball is now in the East's court so watch for the next idiot's idea to come from that side :banghead:
 
The illegal supply is already out there. This wont help solve much crime at all unless the majority of criminals start using brand new handguns.

I guess they expect criminals to trade in all their old guns for new ones with these special firing pins or what? :confused:
 
This from the guy who authored the 50bmg ban bill.
His one objective is to see private firearm ownership
here in Ca abolished. This is just another back door
way of doing it. The anti's don't go about this head
on, they come up with legislation that chips away
at owning a firearm. Make it to expensive to buy,
make the paperwork to complicated to go through
in buying the weapon, make all who want a sidearm
go through a test, charge them for the tests, and
wait 10 "cooling off" days, while only being allowed
to purchase one sidearm a month, etc..

It's a dog and pony show with law abiding
Californians who'd like to own handguns, the subjects
of "legal" discrimination and this micro stamping
bill is yet another attempted nail in the coffin of
legal gun ownership.

However in doing so, do these same politicos think
we who own weapons here in Ca, would turn them
in without even a second thought ? That's a decision each
man and woman has to make when the time comes,
if it comes. I've already made mine.

However we that have to stay here, will and fight
people like Koretz and the rest of those who give
support to law breakers [illegal aliens] with a
Senate passed declaration, while ostracizing Ca's
law abiding present & potential gun owners.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top