KelTec Sub 2000 Impressions -- The Good and Bad of this Carbine

Status
Not open for further replies.

9mm+

Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
856
Location
Cary, NC
I’ve been looking at these Sub 2000 in .40S&W for quite some time as a handy carbine to throw in a bag if needed and to have a plinking toy with HD/SD capabilities. After some bargain searching, I took the plunge and bought one for about $450 (included an extra mag). I know that there are dozens of range reports out there on the Sub2K, but I wanted to share some impressions about this firearm – both the good and the bad.

The Good:

1) It’s a very soft shooter, even in .40 +P. This is due to the very large bolt/BCG and stiff recoil spring.

2) Fairly accurate. I zero’d in an Ultimate Arms holograph sight (which I really like on this gun) and was hitting the target with 3” groupings @ 25 yds with an unsupported standing position. The range ventilation was blowing hard and the target wouldn’t stop swinging, so I was pretty happy with this grouping.

3) Didn’t chrono the .40 +P rounds, but I suspect that the extra length of barrel was yielding another 250-300 fps over a 4” pistol barrel. Pretty zippy.

4) I thought the folding capability was a bit gimmicky at first, but I’ve come to appreciate its utility very quickly. I was able to fold the entire carbine and place it in the top of my range bag (see photo). That’s pretty damn handy for carrying and storing/concealing.

5) The Red Lion Precision forend is outstanding, perhaps the best aftermarket modification that can be done for the Sub2K. The stock forend is *okay*, but the RLP forend’s precision aluminum construction blows everything away.

The Bad:

1) Perhaps the worst trigger I’ve ever squeezed. It’s like trying to squish a marshmallow. Way too much trigger creep and very long reset. I’m already researching aftermarket trigger groups for this gun.

2) Poor finish on the plastic. The first 5 rounds all had FTE’s because the plastic wasn’t trimmed back enough on the ejector port. I made a quick adjustment with my pocket knife and didn’t have another FTE after that.

3) Terrible sights, which I removed completely. Although I followed every step online about removing the front sight post, the banding collar on my Sub2K refused to budge. I had to carefully grind out the collar to get enough separation to finally torch it open. Perhaps the most frustrating few hours I’ve had with a gun. I put on the holograph sight as the primary and will mount some cheap 45deg offset irons on the rail as a backup. :banghead:

4) Poor quality on the polymer construction. I over-inserted the extended mag (not by much) and the mag well split. Not a biggie since I had planned to put on an overgrip which would hold the two halves of the well together (they can also be epoxied, too, but this isn’t necessary if the overgrip is on).

Conclusion:

Neat concept and a useful carbine overall, but it’s a bit expensive when considering the poor quality of the construction. If you’re willing to put another $200 into the Sub2K (for the RLP forend, for example), you’ll end up with something you really like. I will keep this firearm near the bedside for a backup HD gun, and it will definitely go into my BOB if I need to head for the hills for some reason. There’s a lot to be said for having ammo common to both rifle and pistol when you’re on the move. I would plan on putting at least 300 rounds downrange during the break-in to see what the gun likes and doesn’t like. My Sub2K ate everything with the exception of the FTE’s from ejector port obstruction which I trimmed back.

Happy shooting!
 

Attachments

  • Sub2K.jpg
    Sub2K.jpg
    84 KB · Views: 255
Last edited:
Good review, very thorough.

While I find the carbine light and handy, I'm in my own league concerning the folding feature, and its lack of necessity, at least where I'm concerned.

I agree with your opinion of the sights and trigger.

I sold mine and promptly bought a Hi Point, and found it to be superior, at least subjectively.
 
Thanks for the review.

I've been eyeing one up but have been trying to decide between that and the Hi Point carbine in .40 S&W.

My experience with Kel Tec customer service has been outstanding. I don't think that there is a manufacturer that stands behind their products better than Kel Tec. Most of their products come of a little unpolished but they seem to work fine after a little time in the garage doing some finishing work.

I also really like that forend. Can you take a pic with the carbine unfolded if you have the time?
 
I also really like that forend. Can you take a pic with the carbine unfolded if you have the time?

Here are some more photos of the Sub2K with RLP forend in various configurations. The slight color mismatch is due to the different hue from the aluminum over that of the polymer.
 

Attachments

  • Sub2k-1.jpg
    Sub2k-1.jpg
    56.6 KB · Views: 103
  • Sub2k-2.jpg
    Sub2k-2.jpg
    64.4 KB · Views: 135
  • sub2k-3.jpg
    sub2k-3.jpg
    45.4 KB · Views: 85
  • Sub2k-4.jpg
    Sub2k-4.jpg
    64.7 KB · Views: 109
Last edited:
I sold mine and promptly bought a Hi Point, and found it to be superior, at least subjectively.

Just out of curiosity, how much did you pay for that Hi-Point? I've been looking at these, too.
 
I picked one up new about a year ago for around $250. Came with a cheap but perfectly fuctional 2.5x (IIRC) illuminated reticle scope. Works flawlessly with the factory mags.

A guy used to be able to find them cheaper yet. Nowadays, I wouldnt count on it.
 
Whoa, I almost forgot. Be sure to add some kind of rubber padding or spacer to the butt. It's not that the LOP is too short, it's because any CLP or RemOil will leak down the buffer tube and through the stock onto your shirt. :( Not that I wear my finest duds on the range, but I've already trashed my favorite Crystal Gale shirt.
 
$300 is a great price. Leaves a lot of headroom for aftermarket adjustments.

Willie -- you may have landed a great trigger job on yours. Definitely keep it! :)
 
I have the carbine you have. The trigger is a non issue with me because I am a C&R junkie and shoot many kinds of old military rifles. The front sight sucks. I just can't see it. I painted it black which helps. It is hard to shoot the gun with muffs on. They bang on the stock. I have found out the Korean mags are a very tight fit in the mag well. The Glock mags work fine. I sanded down the Korean mags so they fit better. They function ok though. I bought the butt extension and it will never stay on. I would like to install a red dot but have not got around to it yet...chris3
 
Literally bought one three days ago for $400 and bought a cheap Korean made 28 rd mag for $30 (hopefully cheap will equal functional this time around). I like the review and will probably take it out to the range in the next thirty minutes! Hopefully the goods will stay good and the bad play out better than your experience. I kinda figured this gun would need some touching up but for $400 bucks I already expected that. Thanks!
 
I'm very happy with my 9mm Sub2k. That it uses Glock 17 mags is a bonus since I just happen to have one of those.

There are lots of upgrades a person can do to really spiff it up, as the OP said the Red Lion foregrip is excellent, if not spendy. They also make a nice front sight that is much better than the factory one.

I would have liked to see a more finished, sturdy magwell, I'm just careful with it. The stock trigger on mine is fine, it's no Timney, but I've felt worse.

It's one of those guns where if all I did was focus on the cons, I'd get rid of it. On balance however, it has more pros than cons for me. If mine were lost or stolen, I'd replace it.
 
I'm very happy with my 9mm Sub2k. That it uses Glock 17 mags is a bonus since I just happen to have one of those.

There are lots of upgrades a person can do to really spiff it up, as the OP said the Red Lion foregrip is excellent, if not spendy. They also make a nice front sight that is much better than the factory one.

I would have liked to see a more finished, sturdy magwell, I'm just careful with it. The stock trigger on mine is fine, it's no Timney, but I've felt worse.

It's one of those guns where if all I did was focus on the cons, I'd get rid of it. On balance however, it has more pros than cons for me. If mine were lost or stolen, I'd replace it.

I think this sums it up perfectly. It has more pros than cons, and the one pro that you can't overemphasize is the Fun Factor. The S2K is a lot of fun to shoot. I always take it to the range and have a blast with it. With the holographic sight, small size and low swing weight, it's almost too easy to use. When taking newbies to the range, the S2K is the first gun I use to introduce shooting to them.
 
I sure like mine. The trigger is actually pretty good, the sights are not awesome but certainly usable (Easy to hit a 12" steel plate at 100 yards), and the portability can't be beat.

The only problem I had was the polymer mag catch that wore out. Kel Tec told me I could send it in and they would replace it with a steel one, or they could send me the part. The steel catch is still going strong.
 
I enjoy mine, no complaints about the trigger. The fact that I can fold it and stick it in a nondescript computer shoulder bag is priceless.

To the OP, since you already have the front sight off, shaving the inside of a Hi-Point metal AK type sight with a Dremel results in a very nice front sight for a Sub2K.
 
I had a sub2k 9mm, glock mag model. I hated it. It would feed nothing reliably, the charging handle would catch on my coat/sling, bad trigger, bad sights, folding wasnt very useful to me and I just couldnt warm up (pun intended) to the frozen cheek weld that steel tube offered. After a trip back to the factory for repairs, it still didnt cycle without a few hangups per mag (17's or 33's, all glock factory). It actually bothers me to say this, but the KelTec's quality isnt up to par with HiPoints:what:. I've had 2 Hipoints and they have been 100% reliable (a few fail to fires, but the primers were bad and wouldnt go bang in my pistols either). For me, the ability to use hi cap mags was a non issue, since the Sub2k couldnt go 10rds without failure anyway.:banghead:

My personal experience, not saying they are all bad, but mine was a worthless POS.
 
My brother had one and his bad experience sounds like everyone else. He sent his back 2x over function issues and the plastic at the ejection port chipping away and cracked. He concluded that it was a disposable gun and sold it. The main thing I remember about it was the awful trigger
 
Thanks very much for the thread.
Ok so it sound like KelTec and HiPoint are kind of the lower rung, quality wise. Do any companies that are known for better quality have comparable models? (Sig, Ruger, etc)
 
Thanks very much for the thread.
Ok so it sound like KelTec and HiPoint are kind of the lower rung, quality wise. Do any companies that are known for better quality have comparable models? (Sig, Ruger, etc)
I tried the AR15 9mm route and didn't care for it much. My gunsmith loves his AR15 9mm based on the Lone Wolf Distributing platform which also use Glock magazines. I've never shot his but just handling it says it's very nice quality. I just don't want to tie up that much money in a 9mm carbine, and they quite often have extended wait times to ship product.

If I were going to "upgrade", I'd go Lone Wolf.
 
According to all I ever read, the Hi Point 9MM carbine is accurate and simply works. Probably the best bang for the buck in a 9MM carbine. I almost bought a used on at a show one time.

That said, I love my 9MM AR, but not everyone, especially young folks with tight budgets, can throw $800 plus at a 9MM carbine. :)
 
Just shy of two years ago, I was in the market for a 9mm carbine. I ruled out the Beretta Storm due to price, and then couldn't find a Kel-tec anywhere. The Hi-Point 995TS was my third (last) choice, and even then, none of the numerous local dealers had one in stock or could get one. I went to an out-of-town gun show, bought the Hi-Point for ~$300, and haven't looked back since. The only time I ever needed to contact Hi-Point customer service - because I lost my front sight - they were quick, courteous and had a free replacement on its way within minutes.

I will admit, the option of higher mag capacity of the Sub2000 is very appealing; the 15-round ProMags for the Hi-Point are decent but don't exactly inspire confidence. Still, I've only had one questionable mag, and ProMag sent a free replacement under warranty. Like the Sub2000, my 995TS does have quite a bit of plastic, although it's quite a bit heavier. I did spent entirely too much on a clearance-priced PFI red dot scope for the Hi-Point, as well as a Magpul AFG to replace the folding foregrip included with the gun. It was absolutely accurate with factory sights, but as this was prior to my first AR purchase, I wanted a few toys to go with it.

I do have a Kel-tec SU-16 which has been absolutely reliable, with only the awful factory sights to keep it from a "perfect" score in my opinion. A $25 4X scope served as a functional replacement.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top