JShirley,
i understand where you are coming from, but at what point does urban rifle become "less than 21 feet, only" rifle?
I have much less training than you, quite obviously, you know quite a bit more than me on that. But just like you said, it is distance. EVEN when someone says urban, why does that mean pistol range or less? I live in thick woods, and that has less useable range to it than an "urban" environment, so why would i want to limit myself to a weapon of 21 feet or less? what if the guy is 22 feet away and I have just enough time to stop him with my (too embarrassed to be seen with, because its just not tactical!!).22.
Train more? to the average guy around here, training means running more than 1 box of ammo through your pistol in a week. Not many people get enough GUN training, let alone advanced hand to hand combat training, or knife fighting training.
And if your magic knife is so great, i wonder why i have heard stories of bears also falling to .22's?
So, basically, you are saying, you think your knife is superior because WITHIN 20 feet, its superior? im still failing to see the connection with "urban", and "within 21 feet". It would be one thing to say, the .22 is an inferior choice to a more powerful round, but are trying to convince me it is worse than a knife? I dont work at the circus, and i wouldnt even want someone who DID to have to rely on knives past 5 feet, let alone the "magical" 21 feet when someone who is shot fatally could still attack you.
And by the way, 2 other people spoke up as soon as i mentioned a .22, thinking it was obviously a good idea. Im sorry i messed up your super-tactical, mall ninja plans. I just happen to think that a 70 year old with arthritis, or a 10 year old kid even, could happen to pick up a .22 a lot easier than ADVANCED KNIFE FIGHTING............
So im sorry master, i forgot, i was angering you with a different point of view. i hope you can be so "kind" next time...........