CZ-75 was my "Lemon" and it soured me on CZs forever. Clunky, inaccurate, constant FTF, FTE in every magazine. I could not dump it fast enough.
What is funny is that in my collection I have 3 of the most maligned firearms on the internet: Taurus (granted, it is an early production PT92), Raven .25, and a very early production Intratec Tec-9. Very reliable and surprisingly accurate in the case of the latter 2.
I exclude the surprise factor from the Taurus, as it has over 25k rounds through it at the moment, and has always run flawlessly. I have replaced springs at each 10k mark, that's it.
Granted, the Tec-9 can have function issues if you limp-wrist, grip the magazine, or ever attempt to dry fire it (you will snap the firing pin); mine is incredibly accurate, and well made. Later models that I have handled were produced poorly, and fit and finish was nonexistent after the 1980s. Most especially after they began releasing Tec-9M, Tec-22, and later DC-9 series.
The Raven has always been accurate - I used to plink and sink empty 12 gauge hulls floating by in a stream with it. It's just a horribly manufactured weapon, without any thought or care during production. It fits in an ankle holster very comfortably and is easy to CC at any time. Is the .25ACP inadequate? Most likely, but I won't volunteer to be shot with one. Better a mouse gun than no gun.
I'm sure to catch hell from CZ-lovers, but it's the same way I feel about Taurus haters. You got a bad gun, or never owned one and only read about other people's issues. <shrug>